ABOUT TURN: POLICY REVERSALS AND THE QUEENSLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMISSION

被引:3
作者
Dollery, Brian [1 ]
Wallis, Joe [2 ]
Crase, Lin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Sch Econ & Ctr Local Govt, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[2] Amer Univ Sharjah, Dept Publ Adm, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Business, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
ECONOMIC PAPERS | 2007年 / 26卷 / 04期
关键词
Amalgamation; local government; policy reversals; Queensland;
D O I
10.1111/j.1759-3441.2007.tb01020.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In common with other Australian local government systems, Queensland local councils have experienced acute pnancial and other problems. In a collaborative attempt to address these problems, in 2005 the Queensland state government and the Local Government Association of Queensland (LGAQ) embarked on a Size, Shape and Sustainability (SSS) program to evaluate the sustainability of local councils and provide solutions to the problems the process was designed to unearth. The SSS process was hailed as the best example of voluntary cooperation between state authorities and local councils in the histoty of Australian local government reform. However, after almost two years, in a shock announcement on I7 April 2007 the Queensland Government unilaterally terminated the SSS program and established a Reform Commission to recommend a forced amalgamation across the state. This paper provides a critical appraisal of this drastic policy reversal by considering the official rationale for the `U-turn' and the formal response of the LGAQ to the turnaround in the light of broader trends in Australian local government.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 371
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Improve the Financial Management System of Local Government -Based on the Perspective of Institutional Reform of Local Government in China [J].
Huang De-liang ;
Wang Xing-sheng .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (7TH), VOL II, 2011, :790-794
[22]   Digital government and its effectiveness in public management reform - A local government perspective [J].
Asgarkhani, M .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2005, 7 (03) :465-487
[23]   Water, Justice, and Local Government in Turn-of-the-Century Xinjiang [J].
Schluessel, Eric .
JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY OF THE ORIENT, 2019, 62 :599-625
[24]   Adjustment of Local Regulation About Formation and Structure of Local Government [J].
Kurniasih, Dewi ;
Nengsih, Neng Suryanti .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ETHICS IN GOVERNANCE (ICONEG 2016), 2016, 84 :290-294
[25]   The temporal dependence of public policy evaluation: the case of local government amalgamation [J].
McQuestin, Dana ;
Drew, Joseph ;
Iiboshi, Hirokuni .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2023, 49 (05) :953-974
[26]   Community resilience: a policy tool for local government? [J].
Platts-Fowler, Deborah ;
Robinson, David .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2016, 42 (05) :762-784
[27]   The impact of austerity on policy capacity in local government [J].
Eckersley, Peter ;
Tobin, Paul .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2019, 47 (03) :455-472
[28]   Are there Tensions between Democracy and Efficiency in Local Government? A Conceptual Note on the Structural Reform Debate [J].
Dollery, Brian .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (01) :117-123
[29]   THE FORECAST ACCURACY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF QUEENSLAND [J].
Wilson, Tom ;
Rowe, Francisco .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 17 (02) :204-243
[30]   Reputation reform strategies in local government: investigating Denmark and Norway [J].
Lockert, Ashild Skjegstad ;
Bjorna, Hilde ;
Haugen, Kristian H. ;
Salomonsen, Heidi Houlberg .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2019, 45 (04) :504-525