MOVING FORWARD IN BIOETHICAL THEORY - THEORIES, CASES, AND SPECIFIED PRINCIPLISM

被引：74

作者：

DEGRAZIA, D ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV, DEPT HLTH CARE SCI, WASHINGTON, DC 20052 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY | 1992年 / 17卷 / 05期

关键词：

CASUISTRY; DEDUCTIVISM; ETHICAL THEORIES; INTUITION PRINCIPLISM; SPECIFIED PRINCIPLISM; SPECIFICATION;

D O I：

10.1093/jmp/17.5.511

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The field of bioethics has deployed different models of justification for particular moral judgments. The best known models are those of deductivism, casuistry, and principlism (under one, rather limited interpretation). Each of these models, however, has significant difficulties that are explored in this essay. An alternative model, suggested by the work of Henry Richardson, is presented. It is argued that specified principlism is the most promising model of justification in bioethics.

引用

页码：511 / 539

页数：29

共 41 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1985, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS

[2]

[Anonymous], 1978, BELM REP ETH PRINC G

[3] GETTING DOWN TO CASES - THE REVIVAL OF CASUISTRY IN BIOETHICS [J].

ARRAS, JD .

JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 1991, 16 (01) :29-51

[4]

Baier A., 1985, POSTURES MIND

[5] ON ELIMINATING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN APPLIED ETHICS AND ETHICAL THEORY [J].

BEAUCHAMP, TL .

MONIST, 1984, 67 (04) :514-531

[6]

BEAUCHAMP TL, 1989, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P16

[7]

BRANDT R, 1979, THEORY GOOD RIGHT

[8]

Brock D W, 1991, Kennedy Inst Ethics J, V1, P28

[9] QUALITY OF SCHOLARSHIP IN BIOETHICS [J].

BRODY, BA .

JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 1990, 15 (02) :161-178

[10]

BRODY BA, 1988, LIFE DEATH DECISION, P77

← 1 2 3 4 5 →