Comparison of Online Survey Recruitment Platforms for Hard-to-Reach Pregnant Smoking Populations: Feasibility Study

被引:65
作者
Ibarra, Jose Luis [1 ]
Agas, Jessica Marie [1 ]
Lee, Melissa [1 ]
Pan, Julia Lily [1 ]
Buttenheim, Alison Meredith [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Family & Community Hlth, Fagin Hall,4th Fl,418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2018年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
socioeconomic status; smoking; nicotine; cognitive bias; Web-based methods; crowdsourcing; delay discounting; vulnerable populations;
D O I
10.2196/resprot.8071
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recruiting hard-to-reach populations for health research is challenging. Web-based platforms offer one way to recruit specific samples for research purposes, but little is known about the feasibility of online recruitment and the representativeness and comparability of samples recruited through different Web-based platforms. Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of recruiting a hard-to-reach population (pregnant smokers) using 4 different Web based platforms and to compare participants recruited through each platform. Methods: A screener and survey were distributed online through Qualtrics Panel, Soapbox Sample, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results of each recruitment platform, including eligibility yield, quality yield, income, race, age, and gestational age. Results: Of the 3847 participants screened for eligibility across all 4 Web-based platforms, 535 were eligible and 308 completed the survey Amazon mTurk yielded the fewest completed responses (n=9), 100% (9/9) of which passed several quality metrics verifying pregnancy and smoking status. Qualtrics Panel yielded 14 completed responses, 86% (12/14) of which passed the quality screening. Soapbox Sample produced 107 completed surveys, 67% (72/107) of which were found to be quality responses. Advertising through Reddit produced the highest completion rate (n=178), but only 29.2% (52/178) of those surveys passed the quality metrics. We found significant differences in eligibility yield, quality yield, age, number of previous pregnancies, age of smoking initiation, current smokers, race, education, and income (P<.001). Conclusions: Although each platform successfully recruited pregnant smokers, results varied in quality, cost, and percentage of complete responses. Moving forward, investigators should pay careful attention to the percentage yield and cost of online recruitment platforms to maximize internal and external validity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Recruiting Pregnant Patients for Survey Research: A Head to Head Comparison of Social Media-Based Versus Clinic-Based Approaches [J].
Admon, Lindsay ;
Haefner, Jessica K. ;
Kolenic, Giselle E. ;
Chang, Tammy ;
Davis, Matthew M. ;
Moniz, Michelle H. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (12)
[2]   Month-Wise Estimates of Tobacco Smoking During Pregnancy for the United States, 2002-2009 [J].
Alshaarawy, Omayma ;
Anthony, James C. .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 19 (05) :1010-1015
[3]   Access to Care and Use of the Internet to Search for Health Information: Results From the US National Health Interview Survey [J].
Amante, Daniel J. ;
Hogan, Timothy P. ;
Pagoto, Sherry L. ;
English, Thomas M. ;
Lapane, Kate L. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (04) :e106
[4]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[5]   Online Instrument Delivery and Participant Recruitment Services: Emerging Opportunities for Behavioral Accounting Research [J].
Brandon, Duane M. ;
Long, James H. ;
Loraas, Tina M. ;
Mueller-Phillips, Jennifer ;
Vansant, Brian .
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING, 2014, 26 (01) :1-23
[6]   An examination of the equivalency of self-report measures obtained from crowdsourced versus undergraduate student samples [J].
Briones, Elizabeth M. ;
Benham, Grant .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2017, 49 (01) :320-334
[7]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[8]   Beyond Traditional Newspaper Advertisement: Leveraging Facebook-Targeted Advertisement to Recruit Long-Term Smokers for Research [J].
Carter-Harris, Lisa ;
Ellis, Rebecca Bartlett ;
Warrick, Adam ;
Rawl, Susan .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (06)
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002, WOM SMOK REP SURG GE
[10]   An Overview of the Use of Mechanical Turk in Behavioral Sciences: Implications for Social Work [J].
Chan, Chitat ;
Holosko, Michael J. .
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2016, 26 (04) :441-448