A novel use of Twitter to provide feedback and evaluations

被引:8
作者
Desai, Bobby [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, POB 100186, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/tct.12086
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background : Inconsistencies in work schedules and faculty supervision are barriers to monthly emergency medicine (EM) resident doctor evaluations. Direct and contemporaneous feedback may be effective in providing specific details that determine a resident's evaluation. Objectives : To determine whether Twitter, an easy to use application that is available on the Internet via smartphones and desktops, can provide direct and contemporaneous feedback that is easily accessible, and easy to store and refer back to. Methods : First- to third-year EM residents were administered a survey to assess their thoughts on the current monthly evaluation system. Subsequently, residents obtained a Twitter account and were instructed to follow a single general faculty Twitter account for ease of data collection. Following completion of an 8-week study period, a second survey was administered to assess resident thoughts on contemporaneous feedback and evaluations versus the traditional form. Results : Of the 24 EM residents, 13 were available for study. A total of 220 'tweets' were provided by seven faculty members, with a mean of 11 tweets (range 8-17) per resident. The 13 residents received a total of eight formal evaluations from 19 faculty members. The second survey demonstrated that this method provided more detailed evaluations and increased the volume of feedback. Conclusion : Contemporaneous feedback and evaluation provides a greater volume of feedback that is more detailed than end-of-course evaluations. Twitter is an effective and easy means to provide this feedback. Limitations included the length of study time and the inability to have all of the EM residents involved in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 145
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings [J].
Branch, WT ;
Paranjape, A .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (12) :1185-1188
[2]   The feedback sanction [J].
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 7 (11) :1232-1238
[3]  
GIL DH, 1984, J MED EDUC, V59, P856
[4]  
Isaacson JH, 1995, J GEN INTERN MED S, V10, P89
[5]   Have you had your feedback today? [J].
Kogan, JR ;
Bellini, LM ;
Shea, JA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (10) :1041-1041
[6]  
O'Reilly T., WHAT IS WEB 2 0
[7]   Feedback process between faculty and students [J].
Sostok, MA ;
Coberly, L ;
Rouan, G .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (03) :267-267
[8]   IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED PRIMACY AND RECENCY EFFECTS IN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION [J].
STEINER, DD ;
RAIN, JS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (01) :136-142
[9]   Let's Go Formative: Continuous Student Ratings with Web 2.0 Application Twitter [J].
Stieger, Stefan ;
Burger, Christoph .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2010, 13 (02) :163-167