ENHANCEMENT OF PEPTIDERGIC SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION BY CATECHOLAMINES IN THE BULLFROG SYMPATHETIC-GANGLION

被引:3
作者
USHIJIMA, H
KATAYAMA, Y
NISHI, S
机构
[1] TOKYO MED & DENT UNIV, MED RES INST,DEPT AUTON PHYSIOL, 2-3-10 KANDASURUGADAI,CHIYODA KU, TOKYO 101, JAPAN
[2] KURUME UNIV, SCH MED, DEPT PHYSIOL, KURUME, FUKUOKA 830, JAPAN
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM | 1988年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0165-1838(88)90073-2
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Extracellular recordings were made from postganglionic branches or ganglion cells of the 9th or 10th ganglia of the paravertebral sympathetic chain of the bullfrog in vitro. Tetanic preganglionic stimulation, applied to nerve fibers between the 7th and 8th ganglia, elicited cholinergic (muscarinic) and non-cholinergic synaptic responses in nicotinized preparations. These were an early after-discharge (EAD) and a late after-discharge (LAD), respectively. Brief application (3-10 min) of catecholamines augmented the LAD and this augmentation continued for 90-120 min after catecholamine withdrawal. In contrast, these catecholamines did not significantly augment the EAD. The catecholamine effects were concentration-dependent within the range 1-100 .mu.M, and the order of the potency was isoprenaline > adrenaline > noradrenaline > dopamine = phenylephrine. The catecholamine-induced augmentation was blocked by propranolol (0.1-1 .mu.M) and pindolol (1-10 .mu.M), but not by phentolamine (up to 10 .mu.M). The catecholamine-evoked augmentation of the LAD could be mimicked by dibutyryl cyclic adenosine 3'',5''-monophosphate (dbc-AMP) at 1-50 .mu.M. However, similar concentrations of cyclic adenosine 3'',5''-monophosphate (c-AMP), cyclic guanosine 3'',5''-monophosphate (c-GMP) and dibutyryl c-GMP (dbc-GMP) had no effect. None of cyclic nucleotides appreciably augmented the EAD. Methylxanthines, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and caffeine, facilitated the LAD and potentiated the isoprenaline-induced augmentation of the LAD. The excitatory actions of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) were also enhanced by (-)-isoprenaline and dbc-AMP. The former was prevented by propranolol. The present findings indicate that the catecholamine-induced augmentation of the non-cholinergic transmission in the bullfrog sympathetic ganglion is mediated via an increase of intrasomatic c-AMP concentration following stimulation of postsynaptic .beta.-adrenoceptors.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   LONG-TERM POTENTIATION OF SYNAPTIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RELEASE IN THE SUPERIOR CERVICAL-GANGLION OF THE RAT [J].
BRIGGS, CA ;
MCAFEE, DA ;
MCCAMAN, RE .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1985, 363 (JUN) :181-190
[2]  
BROWN DA, 1981, FED PROC, V40, P2625
[3]  
BUTCHER RW, 1962, J BIOL CHEM, V237, P1244
[4]   SITE OF ADRENALINE BLOCKADE IN SUPERIOR CERVICAL GANGLION OF RABBIT [J].
CHRIST, DD ;
NISHI, S .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1971, 213 (01) :107-&
[5]   LONG-TERM FACILITATION OF PEPTIDERGIC TRANSMISSION BY CATECHOLAMINES IN GUINEA-PIG INFERIOR MESENTERIC GANGLIA [J].
DUN, NJ ;
JIANG, ZG ;
MO, N .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1984, 357 (DEC) :37-50
[6]   CHARACTERIZATION OF LRF-LIKE IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN THE FROG SYMPATHETIC-GANGLIA - NON-IDENTITY WITH LRF DECAPEPTIDE [J].
EIDEN, LE ;
ESKAY, RL .
NEUROPEPTIDES, 1980, 1 (01) :29-37
[7]   MODULATION OF CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE LEVELS IN PERIPHERAL-NERVE WITHOUT EFFECT ON RESTING OR COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIALS [J].
HORN, JP ;
MCAFEE, DA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1977, 269 (03) :753-766
[8]   PEPTIDERGIC TRANSMISSION IN SYMPATHETIC-GANGLIA OF THE FROG [J].
JAN, LY ;
JAN, YN .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1982, 327 (JUN) :219-&
[9]   PEPTIDE AS A POSSIBLE TRANSMITTER IN SYMPATHETIC-GANGLIA OF THE FROG [J].
JAN, YN ;
JAN, LY ;
KUFFLER, SW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1979, 76 (03) :1501-1505
[10]   THE MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITORY-ACTION OF ADRENALINE ON TRANSMITTER RELEASE IN BULLFROG SYMPATHETIC-GANGLIA - INDEPENDENCE OF CYCLIC-AMP AND CALCIUM-IONS [J].
KATO, E ;
KOKETSU, K ;
KUBA, K ;
KUMAMOTO, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 84 (02) :435-443