Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study

被引：16
作者：
Prakken, Henry [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Ctr Law & ICT, Fac Law, Groningen, Netherlands
来源：
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW | 2008年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词：
Legal argument; Legal procedure; Dialogue games; Case files;
D O I：
10.1007/s10506-008-9069-1
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
This paper presents a formal reconstruction of a Dutch civil legal case in Prakken's formal model of adjudication dialogues. The object of formalisation is the argumentative speech acts exchanged during the dispute by the adversaries and the judge. The goal of this formalisation is twofold: to test whether AI & law models of legal dialogues in general, and Prakken's model in particular, are suitable for modelling particular legal procedures; and to learn about the process of formalising an actual legal dispute.
引用
收藏
页码：333 / 359
页数：27
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games
    T. J. M. Bench-Capon
    T. Geldard
    P.H. Leng
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2000, 8 (2-3) : 233 - 254
  • [2] Gordon T.F., 1994, ARTIF INTELL, V2, P239
  • [3] Hage J., 1997, REASONING RULES ESSA, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8873-7
  • [4] HAGE JC, 1994, ARTIF INTELL, V2, P113
  • [5] Kowalski R. A., 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law, V4, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF00118494
  • [6] Lauritsen M, 2005, P 10 INT C ART INT L, P95
  • [7] Leclerq W, 1990, PROCESDOSSIERS CIVIE
  • [8] LEENES RE, 1998, HERCULES KARNEADES H
  • [9] Lodder ArnoR., 1999, DIALAW LEGAL JUSTIFI, DOI [10.1007/978-94-011-3957-1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-3957-1]
  • [10] Prakken H., 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law, V4, P331, DOI 10.1007/BF00118496
123