PULPAL RESPONSE TO 2 SEMIHYDROUS GLASS IONOMER LUTING CEMENTS

被引：8

作者：

TOBIAS, RS

BROWNE, RM

PLANT, CG

WILLIAMS, JA

RIPPIN, JW

机构：

[1] Department of Oral Pathology, University of Birmingham Dental School, Birmingham

[2] Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Birmingham Dental School, Birmingham

[3] Institute of Dental Surgery, London

来源：

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL | 1991年 / 24卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00115.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

This study compared the pulpal responses to two innovative semihydrous glass ionomer luting cements (STA1 and ZIN2) with those previously obtained for a conventional anhydrous glass ionomer luting cement, Aquacem3. ZIN contained zinc oxide in the formulation. The study was conducted according to the BSI (1989) recommendations for testing restorative materials in vivo. ZIN was associated with minimal pulpal changes and microbial microleakage, and differed little from the control material, Kalzinol4. The pulpal response to STA was similar to that observed for Aquacem, but was associated with less microbial microleakage. The statistical model demonstrated a significant association between bacterial presence within the experimental cavity and pulpal inflammation. The closer that bacteria were to the pulp, the more severe was the ensuing inflammation.

引用

页码：95 / 107

页数：13

共 39 条

[1]

Barkhordar R.A., Kempler D., Pelzner R.B., Stark M., Antimicrobial action of glass‐ionomer lining cements, Journal of Dental Research, 67, (1988)

[2]

Brannstrom M., Vojinovic O., Nordenvall K.J., Bacteria and pulp reactions under silicate restorations, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 41, pp. 290-295, (1979)

[3]

British Standard Methods for Biological Assessment of Dental Materials, (1989)

[4]

Browne R.M., Plant C.G., Tobias R.S., Quantification of the histological features of pulpal damage, International Endodontic Journal, 13, pp. 104-111, (1980)

[5]

Browne R.M., Tobias R.S., Crombie I.K., Plant C.G., Bacterial microleakage and pulpal inflammation in experimental cavities, International Endodontic Journal, 16, pp. 147-155, (1983)

[6]

Sensitivity related to glass ionomer cements, 8, (1984)

[7]

Reported sensitivity to glass ionomer luting cements, Journal of the American Dental Association, 109, (1984)

[8]

Courv T.L., Miranda F.J., Willer R.D., Probst R.T., Adhesiveness of glass ionomer cement to enamel and dentine: a laboratory study, Operative Dentistry, 7, pp. 2-6, (1982)

[9]

DeSchepper E.J., White R.R., Von der Lehr W., Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers, American Journal of Dentistry, 2, pp. 51-56, (1989)

[10]

Fitzgerald M., Heys R.J., Heys D.R., Charbeneau G.T., An evaluation of glass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage, Journal of the American Dental Associaton, 114, pp. 783-786, (1987)

← 1 2 3 4 →