Monte Carlo Simulation Approaches for Quantitative Bias Analysis: A Tutorial

被引:0
|
作者
Banack, Hailey R. [1 ]
Hayes-Larson, Eleanor [2 ]
Mayeda, Elizabeth Rose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Dept Epidemiol & Environm Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, 270 Farber Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Epidemiol, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bias analysis; confounding; measurement error; misclassification; Monte Carlo sampling; selection bias; simulation study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Quantitative bias analysis can be used to empirically assess how far study estimates are from the truth (i.e., an estimate that is free of bias). These methods can be used to explore the potential impact of confounding bias, selection bias (collider stratification bias), and information bias. Quantitative bias analysis includes methods that can be used to check the robustness of study findings to multiple types of bias and methods that use simulation studies to generate data and understand the hypothetical impact of specific types of bias in a simulated data set. In this article, we review 2 strategies for quantitative bias analysis: 1) traditional probabilistic quantitative bias analysis and 2) quantitative bias analysis with generated data. An important difference between the 2 strategies relates to the type of data (real vs. generated data) used in the analysis. Monte Carlo simulations are used in both approaches, but the simulation process is used for different purposes in each. For both approaches, we outline and describe the steps required to carry out the quantitative bias analysis and also present a bias-analysis tutorial demonstrating how both approaches can be applied in the context of an analysis for selection bias. Our goal is to highlight the utility of quantitative bias analysis for practicing epidemiologists and increase the use of these methods in the epidemiologic literature.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Approaches to reduce the immeasurable time bias in cohort studies: A Monte Carlo simulation study and real-world example
    Oh, In-Sun
    Jeong, Han Eol
    Lee, Hyesung
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Shin, Ju-Young
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 383 - 383
  • [32] Cost sensitivity analysis by Monte Carlo simulation
    Woinaroschy, Alexandru
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 7 (03): : 173 - 177
  • [33] A SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
    MITCHELL, EL
    GIRARD, D
    IEEE COMPUTER GROUP NEWS, 1970, 3 (03): : 67 - &
  • [34] MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION IN RISK ANALYSIS
    HARALAMBIDES, HE
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1991, 20 (02) : 15 - 16
  • [35] Sensitivity analysis in Monte Carlo simulation for dependability analysis
    Marseguerra, M
    Zio, E
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1077 - 1083
  • [36] Analysis of discretization in the direct simulation Monte Carlo
    Hadjiconstantinou, NG
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2000, 12 (10) : 2634 - 2638
  • [37] Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees Based on the Coupling of Structure Functions and Monte Carlo Simulation
    Merle, G.
    Roussel, J. -M.
    Lesage, J. -J.
    Perchet, V.
    Vayatis, N.
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 32 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [38] Combined EPMA, FIB and Monte Carlo simulation: a versatile tool for quantitative analysis of multilayered structures
    Richter, S.
    Pinard, P. T.
    14TH EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON MODERN DEVELOPMENTS AND APPLICATIONS IN MICROBEAM ANALYSIS (EMAS 2015 WORKSHOP), 2016, 109
  • [39] Quantitative Analysis of the Measurement Uncertainty in Form Characterization of Freeform Surfaces based on Monte Carlo Simulation
    Ren, Mingjun
    Cheung, ChiFai
    Kong, Lingbao
    Wang, Sujuan
    13TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AIDED TOLERANCING, 2015, 27 : 276 - 280
  • [40] SIMULATION BY MONTE CARLO
    REED, R
    TAPPI, 1966, 49 (01): : 28 - &