ESTIMATION OF YIELD AND NITROGEN REMOVAL BY CORN

被引:21
作者
OVERMAN, AR [1 ]
WILSON, DM [1 ]
KAMPRATH, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] N CAROLINA STATE UNIV,DEPT SOIL SCI,RALEIGH,NC 27695
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600060015x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A wide variety of mathematical models have been used to relate crop production to management factors such as applied Ei and water availability These include power functions and exponential functions. The objective of this analysis was to use an extended logistic model to relate dry matter yields and plant N removal to applied N for corn (Zea mays L.) for three soils in North Carolina. In this model, response of both dry matter yield and plant N removal to applied N were described by logistic equations. Plant N concentration was then related to applied N by the ratio of these logistic equations. Model parameters were estimated by nonlinear regression. Analysis of variance showed that the N response coefficient c was common for dry matter yield and plant N removal for each soil. Overall correlation coefficients of yield and plant N removal with applied N were very high for all three soils (R > 0.99). It was shown that approximate to 50% of the total dry matter and 80% of total plant N were contained in the grain at all applied N levels. Maximum potential grain yield of 25.9 Mg ha(-1) agreed closely with an estimate in the literature of 26.5 Mg ha(-1) (500 bushels acre(-1)). Dependence of plant N concentration on plant N removal was shown to follow a Linear relationship. The present model provides a rational basis for coupling of dry matter yield and plant N removal in response to applied N. It can be used in design and management decisions related to agricultural production and environmental quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1016
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF MODELS FOR DESCRIBING CORN YIELD RESPONSE TO NITROGEN-FERTILIZER [J].
CERRATO, ME ;
BLACKMER, AM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (01) :138-143
[2]   PREDICTING THE RESPONSE OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS TO FERTILIZER NITROGEN IN RELATION TO CUTTING INTERVAL, CLIMATE AND SOIL [J].
DOYLE, CJ ;
RIDOUT, MS ;
MORRISON, J ;
EDWARDS, C .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1986, 41 (04) :303-310
[3]  
Flannery R. L., 1986, BETTER CROPS PLANT F, V70, P4
[4]  
KAMPRATH EJ, 1986, TECH B N CAROLINA ST, V282
[5]  
OLSON RA, 1988, AGRON MONOGR, V18, P639
[6]   AN EXTENDED MODEL OF FORAGE GRASS RESPONSE TO APPLIED NITROGEN [J].
OVERMAN, AR ;
WILKINSON, SR ;
WILSON, DM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (04) :617-620
[7]   MODEL EVALUATION FOR PERENNIAL GRASSES IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED-STATES [J].
OVERMAN, AR ;
WILKINSON, SR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1992, 84 (03) :523-529
[8]  
OVERMAN AR, 1992, T ASAE, V35, P207, DOI 10.13031/2013.28589
[9]   WATER, HARVEST INTERVAL, AND APPLIED NITROGEN EFFECTS ON FORAGE YIELD OF BERMUDAGRASS AND BAHIAGRASS [J].
OVERMAN, AR ;
NEFF, CR ;
WILKINSON, SR ;
MARTIN, FG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (05) :1011-1016
[10]   A LOGISTIC EQUATION FOR YIELD RESPONSE OF FORAGE GRASS TO NITROGEN [J].
OVERMAN, AR ;
MARTIN, FG ;
WILKINSON, SR .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1990, 21 (7-8) :595-609