Fruit Development Period of Several Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars

被引:3
|
作者
Nesmith, D. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Griffin Campus,1109 Expt St, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
关键词
Vaccinium corymbosum; flowering time; ripening time; heat units; ripening interval;
D O I
10.1080/15538362.2011.619430
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Flowering and ripening times were recorded for the southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) cultivars Emerald, O'Neal, and Star, along with the newer University of Georgia releases 'Camellia', 'Rebel', 'Southern Splendour', and 'Suziblue' over several years at three locations in Georgia. Nearby weather stations were utilized to record temperatures for calculating chill hours and heat units during each of the years. These data were used to calculate fruit development period for the different cultivars as a function of real time (days) and thermal time (heat units). Depending on cultivar and chill hours at a location, flowering time varied as much as 29 days from year to year. Overall, 'Emerald' was the earliest flowering, followed by 'Rebel'. 'Camellia' was the latest to flower among the cultivars. Average fruit development period for the cultivars were: Southern Splendour, 56.2 days; Rebel, 65.3 days; Suziblue, 65.5 days; Star, 67.1 days; Camellia, 68.8 days; O'Neal, 71.9 days; and Emerald, 82.8 days. The shortened fruit development period of 'Southern Splendour' resulted in a ripening time similar to 'Rebel' and 'Star', even though flowering time of 'Southern Splendour' was often several days later. Using heat units instead of days did not greatly reduce the coefficient of variation associated with fruit development period. However, the mean absolute and maximum difference between observed and predicted time to ripening was improved for most cultivars when heat units were used. These data should be useful in estimating how these blueberry cultivars will perform under diverse environments.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COLOR AND COMPOSITION OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CULTIVARS
    SAPERS, GM
    BURGHER, AM
    PHILLIPS, JG
    JONES, SB
    STONE, EG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1984, 109 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [42] LEVELS OF INBREEDING IN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CULTIVARS
    HANCOCK, JF
    SIEFKER, JH
    HORTSCIENCE, 1982, 17 (03) : 363 - 366
  • [43] 'Emerald' southern highbush blueberry
    Lyrene, Paul M.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2008, 43 (05) : 1606 - 1607
  • [44] STABILITY OF YIELD IN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CULTIVARS
    SIEFKER, JH
    HANCOCK, JF
    FRUIT VARIETIES JOURNAL, 1986, 40 (01): : 5 - 7
  • [45] ONEAL SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY
    BALLINGTON, JR
    MAINLAND, CM
    DUKE, SD
    DRAPER, AD
    GALLETTA, GJ
    HORTSCIENCE, 1990, 25 (06) : 711 - 712
  • [46] BLADEN SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY
    ROOKS, SD
    BALLINGTON, JR
    MAINLAND, CM
    HORTSCIENCE, 1995, 30 (01) : 150 - 151
  • [47] HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CULTIVARS AND PRODUCTION TRENDS
    HANSON, EJ
    HANCOCK, JF
    FRUIT VARIETIES JOURNAL, 1990, 44 (02): : 77 - 81
  • [48] 'Rebel' southern highbush blueberry
    NeSmith, D. Scott
    HORTSCIENCE, 2008, 43 (05) : 1592 - 1593
  • [49] 'Gumbo' Southern Highbush Blueberry
    Stringer, Stephen J.
    Shaw, Donna A.
    Sampson, Blair J.
    Sakhanoko, Hamidou F.
    Babiker, Ebrahiem
    Adamczyk, John J., Jr.
    Ehlenfeldt, Mark K.
    Draper, Arlen D.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2018, 53 (09) : 1379 - 1381
  • [50] 'Palmetto' southern highbush blueberry
    NeSmith, DS
    Draper, AD
    Spiers, JM
    HORTSCIENCE, 2004, 39 (07) : 1774 - 1775