Fruit Development Period of Several Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars

被引:3
|
作者
Nesmith, D. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Griffin Campus,1109 Expt St, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
关键词
Vaccinium corymbosum; flowering time; ripening time; heat units; ripening interval;
D O I
10.1080/15538362.2011.619430
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Flowering and ripening times were recorded for the southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) cultivars Emerald, O'Neal, and Star, along with the newer University of Georgia releases 'Camellia', 'Rebel', 'Southern Splendour', and 'Suziblue' over several years at three locations in Georgia. Nearby weather stations were utilized to record temperatures for calculating chill hours and heat units during each of the years. These data were used to calculate fruit development period for the different cultivars as a function of real time (days) and thermal time (heat units). Depending on cultivar and chill hours at a location, flowering time varied as much as 29 days from year to year. Overall, 'Emerald' was the earliest flowering, followed by 'Rebel'. 'Camellia' was the latest to flower among the cultivars. Average fruit development period for the cultivars were: Southern Splendour, 56.2 days; Rebel, 65.3 days; Suziblue, 65.5 days; Star, 67.1 days; Camellia, 68.8 days; O'Neal, 71.9 days; and Emerald, 82.8 days. The shortened fruit development period of 'Southern Splendour' resulted in a ripening time similar to 'Rebel' and 'Star', even though flowering time of 'Southern Splendour' was often several days later. Using heat units instead of days did not greatly reduce the coefficient of variation associated with fruit development period. However, the mean absolute and maximum difference between observed and predicted time to ripening was improved for most cultivars when heat units were used. These data should be useful in estimating how these blueberry cultivars will perform under diverse environments.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Forced-air Cooling, Hydrocooling, or their Combination on Fruit Quality of Two Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars
    Carnelossi, Marcelo A. G.
    Sena, Edinaldo O. A.
    Berry, Adrian D.
    Sargent, Steven A.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (01) : 136 - 142
  • [32] Screening and Testing for Heritability for Anthracnose Susceptibility in Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars
    Phillips, Doug
    Munoz, Patricio
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (09) : S57 - S57
  • [33] Comparing Consumer Overall Liking and Fruit Quality Traits of Southern Highbush and Rabbit-eye Blueberry Cultivars
    Amaral, Kathleen
    Itle, Rachel A.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S98 - S98
  • [34] Sensitivity of Northern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars to Soil Water Deficits during Various Stages of Fruit Development
    Almutairi, Khalid F.
    Bryla, David R.
    Strik, Bernadine C.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2021, 56 (02) : 154 - 162
  • [35] Sensory quality and postharvest performance of southern Highbush blueberry cultivars grown in southern california
    Mitchan, Elizabeth
    Biasi, William
    Gaskell, Mark
    Faber, Ben
    Lobo, Ramiro
    HORTSCIENCE, 2006, 41 (04) : 1043 - 1043
  • [36] 'Southern Splendour' Southern Highbush Blueberry
    NeSmith, D. Scott
    HORTSCIENCE, 2011, 46 (04) : 674 - 675
  • [37] Variation among highbush and rabbiteye cultivars of blueberry for fruit quality and phytochemical characteristics
    Gunduz, Kazim
    Serce, Sedat
    Hancock, James F.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2015, 38 : 69 - 79
  • [38] Resistance to the fruit infection phase of mummy berry disease in highbush blueberry cultivars
    Stretch, AW
    Ehlenfeldt, MK
    HORTSCIENCE, 2000, 35 (07) : 1271 - 1273
  • [39] SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CLONES DIFFER IN POSTHARVEST FRUIT-QUALITY
    PERKINSVEAZIE, P
    CLARK, JR
    COLLINS, JK
    MAGEE, J
    FRUIT VARIETIES JOURNAL, 1995, 49 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [40] Pollen sources influence early fruit growth of southern highbush blueberry
    Huang, YH
    Johnson, CE
    Lang, GA
    Sundberg, MD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1997, 122 (05) : 625 - 629