Fruit Development Period of Several Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars

被引:3
|
作者
Nesmith, D. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Griffin Campus,1109 Expt St, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
关键词
Vaccinium corymbosum; flowering time; ripening time; heat units; ripening interval;
D O I
10.1080/15538362.2011.619430
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Flowering and ripening times were recorded for the southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) cultivars Emerald, O'Neal, and Star, along with the newer University of Georgia releases 'Camellia', 'Rebel', 'Southern Splendour', and 'Suziblue' over several years at three locations in Georgia. Nearby weather stations were utilized to record temperatures for calculating chill hours and heat units during each of the years. These data were used to calculate fruit development period for the different cultivars as a function of real time (days) and thermal time (heat units). Depending on cultivar and chill hours at a location, flowering time varied as much as 29 days from year to year. Overall, 'Emerald' was the earliest flowering, followed by 'Rebel'. 'Camellia' was the latest to flower among the cultivars. Average fruit development period for the cultivars were: Southern Splendour, 56.2 days; Rebel, 65.3 days; Suziblue, 65.5 days; Star, 67.1 days; Camellia, 68.8 days; O'Neal, 71.9 days; and Emerald, 82.8 days. The shortened fruit development period of 'Southern Splendour' resulted in a ripening time similar to 'Rebel' and 'Star', even though flowering time of 'Southern Splendour' was often several days later. Using heat units instead of days did not greatly reduce the coefficient of variation associated with fruit development period. However, the mean absolute and maximum difference between observed and predicted time to ripening was improved for most cultivars when heat units were used. These data should be useful in estimating how these blueberry cultivars will perform under diverse environments.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanical Harvest Potential of Three Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars
    Williamson, Jeffrey G.
    Olmstead, James W.
    Sargent, Steven A.
    Berry, Adrian D.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2011, 46 (09) : S283 - S284
  • [22] Evaluation of southern highbush blueberry cultivars for production in southwestern Arkansas
    Carter, PM
    Clark, JR
    Striegler, RK
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) : 271 - 274
  • [23] Susceptibility of southern highbush blueberry cultivars to phytophthora root rot
    Smith, BJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VACCINIUM CULTURE, 2002, (574): : 75 - 79
  • [24] CYTOPLASMS OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CULTIVARS
    HANCOCK, J
    KREBS, S
    FRUIT VARIETIES JOURNAL, 1986, 40 (02): : 49 - 50
  • [25] Chemical fruit composition of highbush blueberry cultivars grown on different substrates
    Sumedrea, D.
    Ancu, I.
    Oprea, E.
    Sturzeanu, M.
    Nicola, C.
    III BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON FRUIT GROWING, 2016, 1139 : 671 - 676
  • [26] Hydrogen Cyanamide Application Accelerates Vegetative and Flower Bud Development in Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars
    Buck, Jacob M.
    Nunez, Gerardo H.
    Williamson, Jeffrey
    Munoz, Patricio
    Worrie, Lawrence
    HORTSCIENCE, 2020, 55 (09) : S230 - S230
  • [27] Effects of Blueberry red ringspot virus on Yield and Fruit Maturation in Southern Highbush Blueberry
    Williford, L. A.
    Savelle, A. T.
    Scherm, H.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2016, 100 (01) : 171 - 174
  • [28] Performance of Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars Under High Tunnels in Florida
    Santos, Bielinski M.
    Salame-Donoso, Teresa P.
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 22 (05) : 700 - 704
  • [29] DEVELOPMENT OF FRUIT SEPARATION LAYER IN CULTIVATED HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY
    GOUGH, RE
    LITKE, WJ
    HORTSCIENCE, 1978, 13 (03) : 353 - 353
  • [30] In Vitro Shoot Regeneration Protocol for Southern Highbush Blueberry (SHB) Cultivars
    Karn, Anandi
    Enciso-Rodriguez, Felix
    Munoz, Patricio
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL, 2024, 60 (01) : S156 - S156