DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN HEMANGIOMAS AND METASTASES OF THE LIVER WITH ULTRAFAST MR IMAGING - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS WITH T2 CALCULATIONS

被引:31
作者
GOLDBERG, MA [1 ]
SAINI, S [1 ]
HAHN, PF [1 ]
EGGLIN, TK [1 ]
MUELLER, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,32 FRUIT ST,BOSTON,MA 02114
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.157.4.1892026
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We studied the efficacy of T2 measurements at high field strength in distinguishing between liver hemangiomas and hepatic metastases when an ultrafast (single-excitation) MR imaging technique is used. Fourteen patients with known liver tumors were imaged in a 2.0-T prototype ultrafast MR scanner with a spin-echo (infinite TR and TE of 30-340 msec) pulse sequence. Each image was obtained with a total data acquisition time of 20 msec. T2 calculations for hepatic metastases (n = 6) showed a mean of 79.3 +/- 13.5 msec, whereas hemangiomas (n = 8) showed a T2 of 139.8 +/- 18.8 msec (p < .0001). T2 values of lesions had a smaller relative standard deviation than previously reported, and the range of T2 values of hemangiomas (1 19-181 msec) and metastases (68-103 msec) did not overlap. Our preliminary results suggest that T2 calculations with ultrafast MR imaging may be useful for differentiating hemangiomas from metastases. We hypothesize that T2 values obtained from ultrafast MR images are more reliable than those obtained from conventional MR images, primarily because of the elimination of T1 information and effects of motion on image signal intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 730
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A REVIEW OF H-1 NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE RELAXATION IN PATHOLOGY - ARE T1 AND T2 DIAGNOSTIC [J].
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
HARDY, CJ ;
ARGERSINGER, RE ;
ALLENMOORE, G .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (01) :1-37
[2]   ULTRA-FAST IMAGING [J].
COHEN, MS ;
WEISSKOFF, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 9 (01) :1-37
[3]   ERRORS IN T2 ESTIMATION USING MULTISLICE MULTIPLE-ECHO IMAGING [J].
CRAWLEY, AP ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1987, 4 (01) :34-47
[4]   HEPATIC-TUMORS - QUANTITATIVE TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION WITH MR IMAGING [J].
EGGLIN, TK ;
RUMMENY, E ;
STARK, DD ;
WITTENBERG, J ;
SAINI, S ;
FERRUCCI, JT .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :107-110
[5]   RELATIVE INTENSITY OF ABDOMINAL ORGANS IN MR IMAGES [J].
EHMAN, RL ;
KJOS, BO ;
HRICAK, H ;
BRASCH, RC ;
HIGGINS, CB .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (02) :315-319
[6]   LIVER-TUMOR IMAGING - CURRENT CONCEPTS [J].
FERRUCCI, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) :473-484
[7]   DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN SMALL HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS AND METASTASES ON MR IMAGES - IMPORTANCE OF SIZE-SPECIFIC QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA [J].
ITOH, K ;
SAINI, S ;
HAHN, PF ;
IMAM, N ;
FERRUCCI, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (01) :61-66
[8]   BENIGN HEPATIC-TUMORS AND TUMOR LIKE CONDITIONS IN MEN [J].
KARHUNEN, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1986, 39 (02) :183-188
[9]   MR TECHNOLOGY - EFFECT OF EVEN-ECHO REPHASING ON CALCULATED T2 VALUES AND T2 IMAGES [J].
KUCHARCZYK, W ;
BRANTZAWADZKI, M ;
LEMMEPLAGHOS, L ;
USKE, A ;
KJOS, B ;
FEINBERG, DA ;
NORMAN, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (01) :95-101
[10]   DISTINCTION OF HEPATIC CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA FROM HEPATIC METASTASES WITH MR IMAGING [J].
LI, KC ;
GLAZER, GM ;
QUINT, LE ;
FRANCIS, IR ;
AISEN, AM ;
ENSMINGER, WD ;
BOOKSTEIN, FL .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :409-415