COLOR DOPPLER AND DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY AND ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE CAROTID-ARTERY BIFURCATIONS - PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY

被引:0
作者
DEBRAY, JM
GALLAND, F
LHOSTE, P
NICOLAU, S
DUBAS, F
EMILE, J
PILLET, J
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP ANGERS,DEPT RADIOL A,F-49033 ANGERS 01,FRANCE
[2] UNIV HOSP ANGERS,DEPT NEUROL A,F-49033 ANGERS 01,FRANCE
[3] UNIV HOSP ANGERS,DEPT NEUROL B,F-49033 ANGERS 01,FRANCE
[4] UNIV HOSP ANGERS,DEPT VASC SURG,F-49033 ANGERS 01,FRANCE
关键词
DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY; COLOR; DOPPLER IMAGING; ANGIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY STENOSES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We undertook a prospective double-blind study of 128 carotid artery bifurcations using colour Doppler and duplex sonography and angiography. Sixty-four patients with cerebrovascular events were admitted for angiography. All underwent sonography within 24 h of angiography. Standard duplex sonography and colour Doppler imaging without spectral analysis were performed, on the same device, by two sonographers, using defined morphological and haemodynamic criteria. Digital radiological data on vessel diameter were interpreted independently by two radiologists. The two sonographic methods gave similar grading of stenosis, compared to angiography, with an accuracy ranging from 96 % in severe to 83 % in minor stenoses. Colour Doppler studies gave better area measurements than standard duplex sonography, except for major stenoses. Discrepancies between ultrasonography and angiography were due mainly, to minor stenoses and large plaques of calcification on the vessel walls, which masked very segmental 70 % stenoses in 2 cases. Angiography is limited by its own resolution, does not show uncalcified vessel walls and does not give cross-sectional data. It would therefore be inappropriate for showing small plaques, the full extent of ectasia or for defining the carotid bulb accurately. The advantages of colour methods were in investigating sinuous or deep vessels and hypoechoic plaques. Analysis of the residual lumen of a stenosis and its extent could be determined more rapidly. Haemodynamic quantification of stenoses by standard duplex sonography may be difficult because of limited sample volume and error in estimation of angle, whereas colour Doppler allows semiquantitative estimation of haemodynamics. Standard duplex sonography permits good analysis of vessel wall over a limited distance and quantification of velocity; colour Doppler affords overall demonstration of turbulence, acceleration and backward flow.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 224
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Exclusive color-coded duplex sonography of extracranial vessels reliably confirms brain death: A prospective study
    Lambeck, Johann
    Strecker, Christoph
    Niesen, Wolf-Dirk
    Bardutzky, Juergen
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [22] Extrinsic compression of popliteal artery in asymptomatic athlete and non-athlete individuals - A comparative study using duplex scan (color duplex sonography)
    De Almeida, MJ
    Yoshida, WB
    Habberman, D
    Medeiros, EM
    Giannini, M
    De Melo, NR
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2004, 23 (03) : 218 - 229
  • [23] Intimal carotid artery fibromuscular dysplasia displayed by color-coded duplex sonography [Farbkodierte duplex-sonographische darstellung einer intimalen fibromuskularen dysplasie der A. carotis]
    Winter R.
    Ringleb P.
    Hacke W.
    Der Nervenarzt, 1998, 69 (10) : 905 - 908
  • [24] Cerebrovascular disease assessed by color-flow and power Doppler ultrasonography - Comparison with digital subtraction angiography in internal carotid artery stenosis
    Griewing, B
    Morgenstern, C
    Driesner, F
    Kallwellis, G
    Walker, ML
    Kessler, C
    STROKE, 1996, 27 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [25] Validation of Multiparametric Ultrasonography Criteria with Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study
    Barlinn, Kristian
    Rickmann, Henning
    Kitzler, Hagen
    Krogias, Christos
    Strohm, Henning
    Abramyuk, Andrij
    Barlinn, Jessica
    Siepmann, Timo
    Rabahi, Ali
    Graehlert, Xina
    Schwanebeck, Uta
    Winzer, Simon
    Arnold, Sebastian
    Moennings, Peter
    Pallesen, Lars-Peder
    Bodechtel, Ulf
    Mudra, Harald
    Linn, Jennifer
    Reichmann, Heinz
    Alexandrov, Andrei, V
    Gahn, Georg
    Weiss, Norbert
    Puetz, Volker
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2018, 39 (05): : 535 - 543
  • [26] Iohexol vs ioxaglate in lower extremity angiography: A comparitive randomized double-blind study in 80 patients
    Krouwels, MM
    Overbosch, EH
    Guit, GL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 22 (02) : 133 - 135
  • [27] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF IOMEPROL IN RENAL INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY
    SIMONETTI, G
    GUAZZARONI, M
    CARPANESE, L
    CANALIS, GC
    URIGO, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 18 : S73 - S76
  • [28] Prevalence and Clinical Consequences of Carotid Artery Residual Defects Following Endarterectomy: A Prospective CT Angiography Evaluation Study
    van der Kolk, A. G.
    de Borst, G. J.
    Jongen, L. M.
    den Hartog, A. G.
    Moll, F. L.
    Mali, W. P. Th. M.
    Hendrikse, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (02) : 144 - 152
  • [29] Blood Flow Volume Measurement in Cervical and Intracranial Arteries using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Sonography (Bocaccia) - A Prospective Observational Study
    Fiedler, Jiri
    Reiser, Martin
    Kostal, Petr
    Kubale, Jiri
    Ostry, Svatopluk
    Hrbac, Tomas
    Kesnerova, Petra
    Fadrna, Tana
    Langova, Katerina
    Herzig, Roman
    Skoloudik, David
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2021, 42 (01): : 65 - 74
  • [30] ACCURACY OF CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS QUANTIFICATION WITH 4-D-SUPPORTED 3-D POWER-DOPPLER VERSUS COLOR-DOPPLER AND 2-D BLOOD VELOCITY-BASED DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    Macharzina, Roland Richard
    Kocher, Sascha
    Hoffmann, Fabian
    Becher, Harald
    Kammerer, Thomas
    Vogt, Matthias
    Vach, Werner
    Fan, Nian
    Rastan, Aljoscha
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Zeller, Thomas
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05) : 1082 - 1091