How the source of word-of-mouth influences information processing in the formation of brand attitudes

被引:26
作者
Herold, Kristiina [1 ]
Tarkiainen, Anssi [1 ]
Sundqvist, Sanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Sch Business & Management, Lappeenranta, Finland
关键词
Word-of-mouth; higher education; information processing; information; source; evaluation difficulty;
D O I
10.1080/08841241.2016.1146387
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Word-of-mouth (WOM) can be a powerful, persuasive source of information, but relatively little is understood about how consumers utilize information in service evaluations and how the source of WOM (e.g. friends, family) affects attitudes. The importance of WOM is acknowledged in the services context; however, the research field of higher education has found some inconsistent results concerning the impact of WOM. The aim of this study, with its focus on information processing, is to enhance the understanding of these varying results with data from international master's degree applicants. By means of structural equation modeling, the results suggest that the processing of WOM differs depending on the source and the difficulty of evaluation criteria. Information through some sources of WOM is mainly cognitively processed, whereas in others information is processed more as simple cues. Overall, insights are provided into the impact of WOM, and higher education marketing.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 85
页数:22
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications [J].
Ahluwalia, R ;
Unnava, HR ;
Burnkrant, RE .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (04) :458-470
[2]   Projecting corporate brand image and behavioral response in business schools: Cognitive or affective brand attributes? [J].
Alwi, Sharifah Faridah Syed ;
Kitchen, Philip J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2014, 67 (11) :2324-2336
[3]   INTEGRATION THEORY AND ATTITUDE CHANGE [J].
ANDERSON, NH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1971, 78 (03) :171-+
[4]   The Interplay of Information Diagnosticity and Need for Cognitive Closure in Determining Choice Confidence [J].
Andrews, Demetra .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2013, 30 (09) :749-764
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J ACAD BUS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AM J BUSINESS ED, DOI DOI 10.19030/AJBE.V3I10.484
[7]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327]
[8]   REFERENCE GROUP INFLUENCE ON PRODUCT AND BRAND PURCHASE DECISIONS [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
ETZEL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (02) :183-194
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF CONSUMER SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INTERPERSONAL INFLUENCE [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
NETEMEYER, RG ;
TEEL, JE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1989, 15 (04) :473-481
[10]   Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research [J].
Berger, Jonah .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) :586-607