Using a maze task to track lexical and sentence processing

被引:17
作者
Forster, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
lexical access; sentence processing; maze task;
D O I
10.1075/ml.5.3.05for
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
A word maze consists of a sequence of frames, each containing two alternatives. Subjects are required to select one of those alternatives according to some criterion defined by the experimenter. This simple technique can be used to investigate a wide range of issues. For example, if one alternative is a word and the other is a nonword, the subject may be required to press a key to indicate where the word is. This provides an interesting variant of the lexical decision task, since the difficulty of the lexical discrimination can be manipulated on a trial-by-trial basis by varying the properties of the nonword alternative. On the other hand, a version of a self-paced reading task is created if each successive frame contains a word that can continue a sentence, and the subject is required to identify which word that is. Once again, by manipulating the properties of the incorrect alternative one may be able to control the mode of processing adopted by the subject. Although this is a highly artificial form of reading, it does allow one to study the sentence processing under more tightly controlled conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 357
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   AUTOMATIC AND ATTENTIONAL PROCESSES IN THE EFFECTS OF SENTENCE CONTEXTS ON WORD RECOGNITION [J].
FISCHLER, I ;
BLOOM, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1979, 18 (01) :1-20
[2]  
Forster K. I., 2009, UNPUB
[3]   The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time [J].
Forster, Kenneth I. ;
Guerrera, Christine ;
Elliot, Lisa .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (01) :163-171
[4]   PRIMING AND THE EFFECTS OF SENTENCE AND LEXICAL CONTEXTS ON NAMING TIME - EVIDENCE FOR AUTONOMOUS LEXICAL PROCESSING [J].
FORSTER, KI .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :465-495
[5]   PARADIGMS AND PROCESSES IN READING-COMPREHENSION [J].
JUST, MA ;
CARPENTER, PA ;
WOOLLEY, JD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1982, 111 (02) :228-238
[6]   Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension [J].
Nicol, JL ;
Forster, KI ;
Veres, C .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 36 (04) :569-587
[7]  
Qiao X., 2009, RELATIVE CLAUS UNPUB
[8]   Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation [J].
Rayner, K ;
Liversedge, SP ;
White, SJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (03) :310-323
[9]   Toward a model of eye movement control in reading [J].
Reichle, ED ;
Pollatsek, A ;
Fisher, DL ;
Rayner, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (01) :125-157
[10]   Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences [J].
Schilling, HEH ;
Rayner, K ;
Chumbley, JI .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1998, 26 (06) :1270-1281