RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES - THE CASE FOR ARGUMENTATIONAL ANALYSIS IN INFORMATION-RETRIEVAL

被引:17
作者
KIRCZ, JG
机构
[1] Elsevier Science Publishers, AC Amsterdam
关键词
D O I
10.1108/eb026884
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper the extent to which modem indexing and information retrieval research meets the needs and requirements of different types of readers is criticised. A review of the stagnation in this field gives evidence for the need for a radically different approach. The main problem is identified as the assumption that knowledge contained in a scientific article can be represented by a semantic network only, and therefore can be manipulated by formal logic approaches. Complementary to this, a plea is made to start an argumentational analysis of the - highly structured - corpus of scientific articles (mainly in physics). Such an analysis might lead to an argumentational syntax which will also enable the non-expert to browse through large quantities of electronically stored articles. A first attempt at such an approach is given. Furthermore the possible use of the Standard General Markup Language (SGML) approach in relation to a hypertext environment for a possible application is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 372
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Barron D., 1989, Electronic Publishing: Origination, Dissemination and Design, V2, P3
[3]   PHYSICISTS READING PHYSICS - SCHEMA-LADEN PURPOSES AND PURPOSE-LADEN SCHEMA [J].
BAZERMAN, C .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 1985, 2 (01) :3-23
[4]  
BELKIN NJ, 1987, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V22, P109
[5]  
Biebricher P., 1988, 11th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P333
[6]  
Blair D.C., 1990, LANGUAGE REPRESENTAT
[7]  
BOOKSTEIN A, 1985, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V20, P117
[8]  
BOYCE BR, 1985, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V20, P153
[9]  
BRYAN M, 1988, SGML AUTHORS GUIDE S
[10]  
Cleverdon C., 1984, Information Services & Use, V4, P37