Kochia Suppression with Cover Crops in Southwestern Kansas

被引:29
作者
Petrosino, Justin S.
Dille, J. Anita [1 ]
Holman, Johnathon D. [2 ]
Roozeboom, Kraig L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Southwest Res & Extens Ctr, Garden City, KS 67846 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/cftm2014.0078
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) is a well-adapted weed found throughout the semiarid Great Plains and has increased in concern because biotypes with resistance to numerous herbicide modes of action are present, thus reducing options for control. The objectives of the research were to determine if cover crops growing during the fallow phase of a no-till winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-fallow cropping system could reduce kochia density and biomass without reducing subsequent winter wheat yields. Five fall-sown cover crops of Austrian winter pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), winter triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.), and mixtures of Austrian winter pea-winter triticale and hairy vetch-winter triticale were evaluated and compared with chemical fallow and to five spring-sown cover crops of spring lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), spring pea (Pisum sativum L.), spring triticale, and mixtures of spring lentil-spring triticale and spring pea-spring triticale. Fall-sown triticale alone or in mixture reduced kochia density by 78 to 94% and reduced kochia biomass by 98% compared with kochia in chemical fallow. Spring-sown cover crops and kochia emerged together in early March; thus kochia density and biomass were not affected by these cover crops. Fall-sown cover crops that produced more biomass were most effective at suppressing kochia density and biomass. All cover crops were terminated by either forage harvest or chemical application by June 1. Subsequent winter wheat yields varied by cover crop across years, and in general winter wheat after cover crops yielded comparable to or less than chemical fallow.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   RESPONSE OF KOCHIA SELECTIONS TO 2,4-D, DICAMBA, AND PICLORAM [J].
BELL, AR ;
SCHOOLER, AB ;
NALEWAJA, JD .
WEED SCIENCE, 1972, 20 (05) :458-&
[2]   Tillage intensity and crop rotation affect weed community dynamics in a winter wheat cropping system [J].
Blackshaw, RE ;
Larney, FJ ;
Lindwall, CW ;
Watson, PR ;
Derksen, DA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04) :805-813
[3]  
Bond J. J., 1974, USDA ARS CONSERVATIO, V17
[4]   A SIMPLE-MODEL RELATING YIELD LOSS TO WEED DENSITY [J].
COUSENS, R .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1985, 107 (02) :239-252
[5]   EFFECT OF WINTER-WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM) STRAW MULCH LEVEL ON WEED-CONTROL [J].
CRUTCHFIELD, DA ;
WICKS, GA ;
BURNSIDE, OC .
WEED SCIENCE, 1986, 34 (01) :110-114
[6]   Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the northern Great Plains [J].
Derksen, DA ;
Anderson, RL ;
Blackshaw, RE ;
Maxwell, B .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (02) :174-185
[7]   EMPIRICAL-MODELS OF PIGWEED (AMARANTHUS SPP) INTERFERENCE IN SOYBEAN (GLYCINE-MAX) [J].
DIELEMAN, A ;
HAMILL, AS ;
WEISE, SF ;
SWANTON, CJ .
WEED SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (04) :612-618
[8]  
Dille JA, 2012, P WEED SCI SOC AM, V52, P122
[9]  
Eberlein C. V., 1984, Weeds Today, V15, P5
[10]  
FEEKES W, 1941, TARWE HAAR MILIEU VE, P560