Promoting cooperation in construction projects: an integrated approach of contractual incentive and trust

被引:44
作者
Fu, Yongcheng [1 ]
Chen, Yongqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Shuibo [1 ]
Wang, Wenqian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cooperation; Contractual incentive; relational behaviours; trust; task behaviours;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2015.1087646
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Contractual incentive and trust are two commonly used governance mechanisms that help to promote inter-organizational cooperation. Little is known, however, about the boundary conditions for the complementation of these two governance mechanisms. The aim is to investigate the interaction of contractual incentive and trust in promoting inter-organizational cooperation. A three-staged Stackelberg model was established and then solved by backward induction. Research results indicate that contractual incentive can motivate the contractor's task behaviours, while the effect of trust on relational behaviours is path-dependent. Three levels of factors (intra-organizational, inter-organizational and project factors) would affect the selection of the optimal incentive coefficient. Moreover, when the changing rate of the client's cost of effort is less than or equal to a threshold, contractual incentive and trust can be complementary. The study contributes to theory by offering nuanced insights into the governance mechanisms and addressing the complex contracting issues when mutual trust exists. In addition, this study can help to create favourable circumstances for the complementation between contractual incentive and trust, achieving a better project outcome and relational benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 670
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[21]   Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements [J].
Dekker, HC .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2004, 29 (01) :27-49
[22]   A Stochastic Multiple-Leader Stackelberg Model: Analysis, Computation, and Application [J].
DeMiguel, Victor ;
Xu, Huifu .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 57 (05) :1220-1235
[23]   Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? [J].
Eriksson, Per Erik .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (09) :905-917
[24]   TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON ALLIANCE GOVERNANCE: CONNECTING CONTRACT DESIGN, TRUST DYNAMICS, AND CONTRACT APPLICATION [J].
Faems, Dries ;
Janssens, Maddy ;
Madhok, Anoop ;
Van Looy, Bart .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 51 (06) :1053-1078
[25]   Developing Cooperative Project Client-Supplier Relationships: HOW MUCH TO EXPECT FROM RELATIONAL CONTRACTS? [J].
Gil, Nuno .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 51 (02) :144-+
[26]   Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict [J].
Gulati, R ;
Lawrence, PR ;
Puranam, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (05) :415-440
[27]  
Hart O.D., 1988, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V4, P119, DOI DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036940
[28]  
Henisz Witold J., 2012, Engineering Project Organization Journal, V2, P37, DOI 10.1080/21573727.2011.637552
[29]   CHOICE AND PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS: MATCHING ALLIANCE GOVERNANCE TO ASSET TYPE [J].
Hoetker, Glenn ;
Mellewigt, Thomas .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (10) :1025-1044
[30]   AGGREGATION AND LINEARITY IN THE PROVISION OF INTERTEMPORAL INCENTIVES [J].
HOLMSTROM, B ;
MILGROM, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (02) :303-328