University-Based Teleradiology in the United States

被引:11
作者
Hunter, Tim B. [1 ]
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Med Imaging, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Arizona Telemed Program, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
来源
HEALTHCARE | 2014年 / 2卷 / 02期
关键词
telemedicine; teleradiology; university-based radiology; academic medicine;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare2020192
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article reviews the University of Arizona's more than 15 years of experience with teleradiology and provides an overview of university-based teleradiology practice in the United States (U.S.). In the U.S., teleradiology is a major economic enterprise with many private for-profit companies offering national teleradiology services (i.e., professional interpretation of radiologic studies of all types by American Board of Radiology certified radiologists). The initial thrust for teleradiology was for after-hours coverage of radiologic studies, but teleradiology has expanded its venue to include routine full-time or partial coverage for small hospitals, clinics, specialty medical practices, and urgent care centers. It also provides subspecialty radiologic coverage not available at smaller medical centers and clinics. Many U.S. university-based academic departments of radiology provide teleradiology services usually as an additional for-profit business to supplement departmental income. Since academic-based teleradiology providers have to compete in a very demanding marketplace, their success is not guaranteed. They must provide timely, high-quality professional services for a competitive price. Academic practices have the advantage of house officers and fellows who can help with the coverage, and they have excellent subspecialty expertise. The marketplace is constantly shifting, and university-based teleradiology practices have to be nimble and adjust to ever-changing situations.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 206
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Variability in Radiology Practice in the United States: A Former Teleradiologist's Perspective [J].
Abramson, Richard G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (02) :318-322
[2]   Teleradiology coming of age: Winners and losers [J].
Boland, Giles W. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (05) :1161-1162
[3]  
Bradley William G Jr, 2007, J Am Coll Radiol, V4, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.04.009
[4]   Off-site teleradiology: The pros [J].
Bradley, William G., Jr. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (02) :337-341
[5]  
Brant-Zawadzki Michael, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.10.009
[6]   RADIOLOGY REPORTING - ATTITUDES OF REFERRING PHYSICIANS [J].
CLINGER, NJ ;
HUNTER, TB ;
HILLMAN, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (03) :825-826
[7]   Factors in the selection of a teleradiology provider in the United States [J].
Hunter, Tim B. ;
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. ;
Weinstein, Ronald S. .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2013, 19 (06) :354-359
[8]  
Kaye Adam H, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.01.009
[9]   Teleradiology in rural Arizona: Users' perspective [J].
Krupinski, E ;
Hopper, L .
PACS DESIGN AND EVALUATION: ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ISSUES - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3035 :350-354
[10]   High-volume teleradiology service: Focus on radiologist satisfaction [J].
Krupinski, E ;
McNeill, K ;
Haber, K ;
Ovitt, T .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2003, 16 (02) :203-209