MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS - POWER, LENGTH AND OPTIMAL NUMBER OF CHOICE PER ITEM

被引:5
作者
ANDRES, AM
DELCASTILLO, JDL
机构
[1] Bioestadistica Facultad de Medicina, Granada
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2044-8317.1990.tb00926.x
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In an earlier paper (Martín Andrés & Luna del Castillo, 1989), three statistical tests for assigning a mark for a student in multiple choice tests were set out. In the present paper, the authors give the power of all three tests, for the purpose of selecting the best one for each particular case. They also give the formulae for determining the minimum number of questions (sample size) for an examination with k alternatives (only one of which is the correct answer), to satisfy given requirements about the number of students one wishes to pass or fail undeservedly (formulae which are also valid for giving any other mark, or for deciding the student's level of knowledge with given exactitude). Finally, the authors prove that, under certain very general conditions, it is better to set questions with k = 3 alternative answers, whilst under another criterion, the value k = 2 is to be preferred. The results are compared with the equivalent classic methods. 1990 The British Psychological Society
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 71
页数:15
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   TESTS AND INTERVALS IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS - A MODIFICATION OF THE SIMPLEST CLASSICAL-MODEL [J].
ANDRES, AM ;
DELCASTILLO, JDL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 42 :251-263
[2]  
COLTON T, 1974, STATISTICS MED
[4]  
Lord F. M., 1968, STAT THEORY MENTAL T
[5]   OPTIMAL NUMBER OF CHOICES PER ITEM - COMPARISON OF 4 APPROACHES [J].
LORD, FM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1977, 14 (01) :33-38
[6]  
[No title captured]