Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology

被引:75
作者
Antunovic, Boris [1 ]
Barlow, Susan [1 ]
Chesson, Andrew [1 ]
Flynn, Albert [1 ]
Hardy, Anthony [1 ]
Jeger, Michael-John [1 ]
Knaap, Ada [1 ]
Kuiper, Harry [1 ]
Lovell, David [1 ]
Mortensen, Alicja [1 ]
Norrung, Birgit [1 ]
Pratt, Iona [1 ]
Schlatter, Josef [1 ]
Silano, Vittorio [1 ]
Smulders, Frans [1 ]
Vannier, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
Risk assessment terminology; harmonisation; EFSA; food safety;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2664
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the use of risk assessment terminology within its Scientific Panels. An external report, commissioned by EFSA, analysed 219 opinions published by the Scientific Committee and Panels to recommend possible ways of improving the expression and communication of risk and/or uncertainties in the selected opinions. The Scientific Committee concluded that risk assessment terminology is not fully harmonised within EFSA. In part this is caused by sectoral legislation defining specific terminology and international standards for specific fields of risk assessment and thus for specific Panels. The use of defined terminology for risk assessment is driven by three standard-setting organisations, the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) in relation to food safety, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) for animal health and the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) for plant health, under the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of which the European Union is a member. Should the major purpose of risk assessment be international trade, the Scientific Committee concludes that particular care must be taken that the principles of CAC, OIE or IPPC are followed strictly. EFSA Scientific Panels should identify which specific approach is most useful in dealing with their individual mandates. The Scientific Committee considered detailed aspects of risk assessment terminology and identified their relevance for EFSA to adopt more harmonised use. These included examining definitions of risk and uncertainty, expressing uncertainty and different levels of risk, the merits of using qualitative and quantitative expressions and the use of glossaries of definitions to improve both the understanding and harmonisation of terminology across EFSA's scientific opinions. Follow-up action by EFSA is identified to develop appropriate detailed guidance to the Scientific Panels. Recommendations are made to improve the clarity, consistency and where possible the harmonization of risk assessment terminology within and across EFSA's scientific opinions. (C) European Food Safety Authority, 2012.
引用
收藏
页数:43
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ENV HLTH CRIT
  • [2] Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment Request No EFSA-Q-2004-019 Adopted on 14 December 2006
    Barlow, Sue
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John
    Dybing, Erik
    Flynn, Albert
    Fruijtier-Polloth, Claudia
    Hardy, Tony
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Le Neindre, Pierre
    Schans, Jan
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Skerving, Steffan
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (01)
  • [3] Guidance on Safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements
    Barlow, Susan
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John D.
    Flynn, Albert
    Galli, Corrado L.
    Hardy, Anthony
    Jany, Klaus-Dieter
    Jeger, Michael-John
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Larsen, John-Christian
    Lovell, David
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Smulders, Frans
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (09)
  • [4] BfR (Bundesinstitut fur Risikobewertung), 2010, GUID DOC HLTH ASS 20
  • [5] Guidance on Risk Assessment for Animal Welfare
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Joerg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (01)
  • [6] CAC (Codex Alimentarius Commission), 2011, PROC MAN
  • [7] CAC (Codex Alimentarius Commission), 1999, 301999 CACGL
  • [8] CODEX, 2003, CACGL 44 2003
  • [9] Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2009, 722009 CACGL
  • [10] Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), 2006, 592006 CACGL