Measuring Positive and Negative Affect: Development of a Russian-language Analogue of PANAS

被引:0
作者
Osin, E. N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Higher Sch Econ, Psychol Sci, Moscow, Russia
[2] Higher Sch Econ, Psychol Dept, Moscow, Russia
[3] Higher Sch Econ, Sci & Educ Lab Posit Psychol & Qual Life, Moscow, Russia
来源
PSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS | 2012年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
PANAS; psychological assessment of emotions; scales of positive affect and negative affect (SPANA); cross-cultural equivalence; confirmatory factor analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The paper presents the development of a Russian language questionnaire "Scale of Positive and Negative Affectivity" (SPANA) based on the English-language PANAS measure. The cross-cultural equivalence of the short 20-item version of the questionnaire was tested by means of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis using data from an English-language (N = 450) and a Russian-language (N = 475) sample. Measurement unit equivalence of the two instruments was established, although full score equivalence was not fully supported by the data. The new SPANA instrument shows high reliability and predictable associations with other subjective well-being indicators. Cultural and gender differences in positive and negative score are presented and discussed. The latent structure of an extended 57-item pool of Russian-language emotional descriptors is presented, resulting in a set of scales similar to PANAS-X available for research use.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
[12]   The phoenix of bipolarity: Reply to Watson and Tellegen (1999) [J].
Russell, JA ;
Carroll, JM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (05) :611-617
[13]   On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect [J].
Russell, JA ;
Carroll, JM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (01) :3-30
[14]   3-DIMENSIONS OF EMOTION [J].
SCHLOSBERG, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1954, 61 (02) :81-88
[15]  
Van de Vijver F. J. R., 1997, METHODS DATA ANAL CR
[16]  
van de Vijver F. J. R., 2011, CROSS CULTURAL RES M
[17]   WHY FACTOR-ANALYSIS OFTEN IS THE INCORRECT MODEL FOR ANALYZING BIPOLAR CONCEPTS, AND WHAT MODEL TO USE INSTEAD [J].
VANSCHUUR, WH ;
KIERS, HAL .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1994, 18 (02) :97-110
[18]  
Veenhoven R, 2001, J HAPPINESS STUD, V2, P111, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1011587828593, 10.1023/A:1011587828593]
[19]   TOWARD A CONSENSUAL STRUCTURE OF MOOD [J].
WATSON, D ;
TELLEGEN, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 98 (02) :219-235
[20]   DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF BRIEF MEASURES OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT - THE PANAS SCALES [J].
WATSON, D ;
CLARK, LA ;
TELLEGEN, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 54 (06) :1063-1070