NOTETAKING AND DEPTH OF PROCESSING

被引:106
作者
BRETZING, BH
KULHAVY, RW
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0361-476X(79)90069-9
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Four levels of notetaking (summary, paraphrase, verbatim, and letter search) were used to control depth of processing of a prose passage with 180 high school students, who then either reviewed their notes or read an interpolated text. A separate control group took no notes. On immediate and delayed post-tests, post hoc analyses with the depth (notetaking) condition showed the following ranking: summary = paraphrase > control = verbatim > letter search. A paraphrase notes × review × test-position interaction was significant, indicating that less forgetting occurred on a delayed post-test when students reviewed their paraphrase notes than when they read an interpolated text. Analysis of reading times showed that the additional time required for notetaking was only worthwhile when meaningful notes were taken. © 1979.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 153
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ANDERSON RC, 1972, REV EDUC RES, V42, P145
[2]   RETROACTIVE INHIBITION OF MEANINGFUL DISCOURSE [J].
ANDERSON, RC ;
MYROW, DL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 62 (01) :81-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, MEASUREMENT READABIL
[4]   COMPREHENSION AND RECALL OF SENTENCES [J].
BOBROW, SA ;
BOWER, GH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (3P1) :455-&
[5]   CONTEXTUAL PREREQUISITES FOR UNDERSTANDING - SOME INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPREHENSION AND RECALL [J].
BRANSFORD, JD ;
JOHNSON, MK .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :717-726
[6]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684
[7]  
DYER J, 1974, THESIS ARIZONA STATE
[8]   EFFECT OF NOTE TAKING AND REVIEW ON RECALL [J].
FISHER, JL ;
HARRIS, MB .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 65 (03) :321-325
[9]  
Greene EB, 1934, SCHOOL SOC, V39, P619
[10]   MEANINGFULNESS AND RECALL OF TEXTUAL PROSE [J].
JOHNSON, RE .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1973, 10 (01) :49-58