THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERMEANT SIZE AND PERMEABILITY IN LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES

被引:0
|
作者
XIANG, TX [1 ]
ANDERSON, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH,DEPT PHARMACEUT & PHARMACEUT CHEM,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
来源
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY | 1994年 / 140卷 / 02期
关键词
PERMEABILITY; TRANSPORT; BILAYERS; SIZE DEPENDENCE; PARTITION COEFFICIENTS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Permeability coefficients (P-m) across planar egg lecithin/decane bilayers and bulk hydrocarbon/water partition coefficients (K-w-->hc) have been measured for 24 solutes with molecular volumes, V, varying by a factor of 22 and P-m values varying by a factor of 10(7) to explore the chemical nature of the bilayer barrier and the effects of permeant size on permeability. A proper bulk solvent which correctly mimics the microenvironment of the barrier domain was sought. Changes in P-m/K-w-->hc were then ascribed to size-dependent partitioning and/or size-dependent diffusivity. The diffusion coefficient-size dependency was described by D-barrier = D-o/V-n. When n-decane was used as a reference solvent, the correlation between log P-m/K-w-->hc and log V was poor (r = 0.56) with most of the lipophilic (hydrophilic) permeants lying below (above) the regression line. Correlations improved significantly (r = 0.87 and 0.90, respectively) with more polarizable solvents, 1-hexadecene and 1,9-decadiene. Values of the size selectivity parameter n were sensitive to the reference solvent (n = 0.8 +/- 0.3, 1.2 +/- 0.1 and 1.4 +/- 0.2, respectively, for decane, hexadecene, and decadiene). Decadiene was selected as the most suitable reference solvent. The value for n in bilayer transport is higher than that for bulk diffusion in decane (n = 0.74 +/- 0.10), confirming the steep dependence of bilayer permeability on molecular size. Statistical mechanical theory recently developed by the authors suggests that a component of this steep size dependence may reside in size-dependent solute partitioning into the ordered chain region of bilayers. This theory, combined with the above diffusion model, yielded the relationship, P-m/K-w-->hc = D(o)exp(-alpha V)V-n. A fit of the experimental data to this model gave the best fit (r = 0.93) with alpha = 0.0053 +/- 0.0021 and n = 0.8 +/- 0.3, suggesting that both diffusion and partitioning mechanisms may play a role in determining the size dependence of lipid bilayer permeabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERMEANT SIZE AND PERMEABILITY IN LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    XIANG, TX
    ANDERSON, BD
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 66 (02) : A174 - A174
  • [2] TRACER PERMEABILITY OF LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    GRINFELDT, AE
    MALEV, VV
    SHCHAGINA, LV
    TSITOLOGIYA, 1980, 22 (02): : 182 - 188
  • [3] HYDROXYL ION PERMEABILITY OF LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    GUTKNECHT, J
    WALTER, A
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1981, 645 (01) : 161 - 162
  • [4] WATER PERMEABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    JAUCH, P
    BENZ, R
    BIOPHYSICS OF STRUCTURE AND MECHANISM, 1981, 7 (04): : 306 - 306
  • [5] PERMEABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HEMOCYANIN CHANNEL IN LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    ANTOLINI, R
    MENESTRINA, G
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1981, 30 (04): : 305 - 306
  • [6] PERMEABILITY OF SMALL NONELECTROLYTES THROUGH LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    WALTER, A
    GUTKNECHT, J
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY, 1986, 90 (03): : 207 - 217
  • [7] MEMBRANE-POTENTIAL AND ION PERMEABILITY OF LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    OHKI, S
    BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1980, 7 (03): : 487 - 501
  • [8] THE NON-ELECTROLYTE PERMEABILITY OF PLANAR LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    ORBACH, E
    FINKELSTEIN, A
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 75 (04): : 427 - 436
  • [9] ON THE INTERACTION OF HEMOCYANIN WITH LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    PASQUALI, F
    MENESTRINA, G
    EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL WITH BIOPHYSICS LETTERS, 1985, 12 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [10] DISPLACEMENT CURRENTS IN LIPID BILAYER-MEMBRANES
    DIAZ, E
    SANDBLOM, J
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 87 (01) : 33 - 42