Response to Intervention: General or Special Education? Who Is Responsible?

被引:7
|
作者
Hazelkorn, Michael [1 ]
Bucholz, Jessica L. [1 ]
Goodman, Janet I. [2 ]
Duffy, Mary Lou [3 ]
Brady, Michael P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Georgia, Dept Special Educ & Speech Language Pathol, Carrollton, GA 30118 USA
[2] Haralson Cty Schools, Buchanan, GA USA
[3] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Except Student Educ, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
来源
EDUCATIONAL FORUM | 2010年 / 75卷 / 01期
关键词
legal issues; non-G/T; Response to Intervention; special education;
D O I
10.1080/00131725.2010.528552
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a general education initiative that takes place prior to evaluation for placement in special education. Essentially, the first two tiers of RtI require general education teachers to use research-based instruction with all students and then to evaluate the effectiveness of that instruction. Given that the use of RtI as an assessment tool begins in the general education classroom, the following question remains: Are general educators aware of the development and implementation of RtI as a process for assessing and, eventually, possibly placing students into special education? The purpose of this study was to review the literature to answer the following two questions: 1. To what extent is RtI evident in the professional literature of educator groups (teachers, administrators, and teacher educators) who will be responsible for implementing these school practices? 2. What is the nature of the published literature (concept papers, assessment practices, instructional practices, and research) on RtI?
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empty Seat at the Table: Examining General and Special Education Teacher Collaboration in Response to Intervention
    Gomez-Najarro, Joyce
    TEACHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2020, 43 (02) : 109 - 126
  • [2] Perspectives of special Education Directors on Response to Intervention in Secondary Schools
    Frank J. Sansosti
    Shannon Goss
    Amity Noltemeyer
    Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly "The California School Psychologist", 2011, 15 (1): : 9 - 20
  • [3] Barriers and Benefits to Response to Intervention: Perceptions of Special Education Teachers
    Werts, Margaret Gessler
    Carpenter, Ellen Stahl
    Fewell, Caitlin
    RURAL SPECIAL EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2014, 33 (02) : 3 - 11
  • [4] Special Education Teachers' Perceptions and Instructional Practices in Response to Intervention Implementation
    Swanson, Elizabeth
    Solis, Michael
    Ciullo, Stephen
    McKenna, John W.
    LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 2012, 35 (02) : 115 - 126
  • [5] Who Is Placed into Special Education?
    Hibel, Jacob
    Farkas, George
    Morgan, Paul L.
    SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2010, 83 (04) : 312 - 332
  • [6] Birth characteristics of children who used early intervention and special education services in New York City
    Romo, Matthew L.
    McVeigh, Katharine H.
    Jordan, Phoebe
    Stingone, Jeanette A.
    Chan, Pui Ying
    Askew, George L.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 42 (04) : E401 - E411
  • [7] General Education Pre-Service Teachers' Levels of Concern on Response to Intervention (RTI) Implementation
    Barrio, Brenda L.
    Combes, Bertina H.
    TEACHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2015, 38 (02) : 121 - 137
  • [8] IEP Use by General and Special Education Teachers
    Rotter, Kathleen
    SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (02): : 1 - 8
  • [9] A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education
    VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.
    Witt, Joseph C.
    Gilbertson, Donna
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 45 (02) : 225 - 256
  • [10] Training preservice general education teachers in response to intervention: A survey of teacher educators throughout the United States
    Vollmer, Laura E.
    Gettinger, Maribeth
    Begeny, John C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 35 (02) : 122 - 145