Four Educational Myths That Stymie Social Justice

被引:9
作者
Beswick, Joan F.
Sloat, Elizabeth A.
Willms, J. Douglas
机构
来源
EDUCATIONAL FORUM | 2008年 / 72卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00131720701804960
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Four myths that underlie persistent, but ineffective, practices in early literacy education are analyzed in this article. Such analysis is essential because literacy disadvantage ultimately is an issue of equity-a matter of social justice. Research shows that these practices can be refuted and that optimal early literacy outcomes are possible for all students when parents, teachers, and school administrators serve as agents of equity.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 128
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Anderson C. S., 1985, RES EXEMPLARY SCH, P97, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-068590-5.50012-7
[2]   Sorting second-grade students: Differentiating those retained from those promoted [J].
Beebe-Frankenberger, M ;
Bocian, KM ;
MacMillan, DL ;
Gresham, FM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (02) :204-215
[3]  
Berninger V. W., 2001, HDB PSYCHOEDUCATIONA, P195
[4]   Comparison of faster and slower responders to early intervention in reading: Differentiating features of their language profiles [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Abbott, RD ;
Vermeulen, K ;
Ogier, S ;
Brooksher, R ;
Zook, D ;
Lemos, Z .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 2002, 25 (01) :59-76
[5]  
Beswick JF., 2005, EDUCATION, V126, P116
[6]  
Coleman J.S., 1966, EQUALITY ED OPPORTUN
[7]  
Crnic K., 1994, EARLY EDUC DEV, V5, P91, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15566935EED0502_2
[8]  
CUNNINGHAM PM, 1994, CLASSROOMS WORK THEY
[9]  
Denton C.A., 2003, LEARNING DISABILITIE, V18, P201, DOI [10.1111/1540-5826.00075, DOI 10.1111/1540-5826.00075]
[10]  
Dickson S. V., 1999, LEARNING DISABILITIE, V14, P191