Impact of risk aversion on fertiliser use: evidence from Vietnam

被引:14
作者
Khor, Ling Yee [1 ]
Ufer, Susanne [1 ]
Nielsen, Thea [1 ]
Zeller, Manfred [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Dept Rural Dev Theory & Policy, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Int Food Policy Res Inst, HarvestPlus, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Fertiliser; input use; risk behaviour; uncertainty; wealth;
D O I
10.1080/13600818.2018.1445212
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Fake or substandard fertiliser is a growing concern in many countries. Even in places not affected by fertiliser quality problems, uncertainty could arise due to weather variability, soil quality, or doubts about the effectiveness of fertiliser in general. Past literature has shown that risk aversion leads to lower fertiliser use and farmers become less risk averse as they become wealthier. We build upon this literature by showing that the marginal effect itself might not be the same for farmers of different wealth levels either. In our study, the measures of risk aversion were elicited from two different techniques: a self-assessment question and a lottery game. Results from regression analysis show that the marginal effect of risk aversion on fertiliser use depends on the wealth levels of farmers. Low-wealth farmers reduce their fertiliser intensity when their risk aversion increases. The marginal effect for high-wealth farmers is insignificant.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 496
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[2]  
Babcock B. A., 1992, Review of Agricultural Economics, V14, P271, DOI 10.2307/1349506
[3]   Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction [J].
Berry, William D. ;
Golder, Matt ;
Milton, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (03) :653-671
[4]   ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK - THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS OF AN EXPERIMENT IN RURAL INDIA [J].
BINSWANGER, HP .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1981, 91 (364) :867-890
[5]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[6]  
Carletto C., 1999, CONSTRUCTING SAMPLES
[7]   Economic behavior under uncertainty: A joint analysis of risk preferences and technology [J].
Chavas, JP ;
Holt, MT .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1996, 78 (02) :329-335
[8]  
Dao D. H., 2002, 2010 TRENDS AN PROD
[9]  
Deng S, 2012, 1700 ARRESTED SHODDY
[10]   Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: Evidence from Ethiopia [J].
Dercon, Stefan ;
Christiaensen, Luc .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 96 (02) :159-173