SENSOR SYNTHESIS FOR CONTROL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

被引:51
作者
CHRYSSOLOURIS, G
DOMROESE, M
BEAULIEU, P
机构
[1] Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 1992年 / 114卷 / 02期
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.2899768
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
When a human controls a manufacturing process he or she uses multiple senses to monitor the process. Similarly, one can consider a control approach where measurements of process variables are performed by several sensing devices which in turn feed their signals into process models. Each of these models contains mathematical expressions based on the physics of the process which relate the sensor signals to process state variables. The information provided by the process models should be synthesized in order to determine the best estimates for the state variables. In this paper two basic approaches to the synthesis of multiple sensor information are considered and compared. The first approach is to synthesize the state variable estimates determined by the different sensors and corresponding process models through a mechanism based on training such as a neural network. The second approach utilizes statistical criteria to estimate the best synthesized state variable estimate from the state variable estimates provided by the process models. As a "test bed" for studying the effectiveness of the above sensor synthesis approaches turning has been considered. The approaches are evaluated and compared for providing estimates of the state variable tool wear based on multiple sensor information. The robustness of each scheme with respect to noisy and inaccurate sensor information is investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 174
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Chryssolouris G., Guillot M., Domroese M., A Decision Making Approach to Machining Control, ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 110, 4, pp. 397-398, (1988)
  • [2] Emel E., Kannatey-Asibu E., Acoustic Emission and Force Sensor Fusion for Monitoring the Cutting Process, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 31, 11-12, pp. 795-809, (1989)
  • [3] Choi G.S., Wang Z.X., Dornfeld D., Development of an Intelligent On-Line Tool Wear Monitoring System for Turning Operations, Proc. Usa-Japan Symposium on Flexible Automation, pp. 683-690, (1990)
  • [4] Chryssolouris G., Domroese M., Beaulieu P., A Statistical Approach to Sensor Synthesis, (1991)
  • [5] Blackman S.S., Theoretical Approaches to Data Association and Fusion, Proc. Of SPIE, 931, pp. 50-55, (1988)
  • [6] Luo R.C., Kay M.G., Multisensor Integration and Fusion: Issues and Approaches, Proc, of SPIE, 931, pp. 42-49, (1988)
  • [7] Luo R.C., Lin M.-H., Robot Multi-Sensor Fusion and Integration: Optimum Estimation of Fused Sensor Data, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, pp. 1076-1081, (1988)
  • [8] Durrant-Whyte H.F., Consistent Integration and Propagation of Disparate Sensor Observations, Proc. IEEE Int. Journal of Robotics and Automation, pp. 1464-1469, (1986)
  • [9] Bogler P.L., Shafer-Dempster Reasoning with Applications to Multisensor Target Identification Systems, IEEE Trans, on System, Man and Cybernetics, SMc-171, 6, pp. 968-977, (1987)
  • [10] Shafer G., A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, (1976)