Muddling between science and engineering: an epistemic strategy for developing human factors and ergonomics as a hybrid discipline

被引:0
作者
Kant, Vivek [1 ]
机构
[1] Symbiosis Inst Design, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Science-engineering relationship; epistemology; human factors; ergonomics; design;
D O I
10.1080/1463922X.2017.1414334
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) recognises itself as a design-driven, systemic and scientific discipline geared towards well-being and performance. Being a scientific discipline and design-oriented requires that the epistemic basis of science and design/engineering be fully comprehended. In interdisciplinary research where these two viewpoints meet, there are often dilemmas posed in terms of knowledge construction and labelling of activity. Therefore, this article scrutinises these two orientations and addresses the differences and commonalities, using case studies from engineering and psychological science (both constituents of HFE). Based on these insights, a way forward is suggested in terms of (1) a reflexive engagement with epistemic concepts and methods; (2) finding a conceptual space for balancing and bridging the science-engineering divide; (3) comprehending 'design-thinking/design knowledge' and not treating it as an application of science; (4) providing emphasis on problem formulation and practices of HFE focusing on developing them in systemic terms.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 635
页数:30
相关论文
共 128 条
[81]   ENGINEERING-EDUCATION IN EUROPE AND THE USA, 1750-1930 - THE RISE TO DOMINANCE OF SCHOOL CULTURE AND THE ENGINEERING PROFESSIONS [J].
LUNDGREEN, P .
ANNALS OF SCIENCE, 1990, 47 (01) :33-75
[82]  
MARK L S, 1990, Ecological Psychology, V2, P325, DOI 10.1207/s15326969eco0204_2
[84]  
Meijers A. W. M., 2012, COMPANION PHILOS TEC
[85]  
Meijers AnthonieW.M., 2013, NORMS TECHNOLOGY, P15, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5243-62
[86]  
Merritt Raymond H., 1969, ENG AM SOC 1850 1875
[87]  
Mitcham C., 1994, THINKING TECHNOLOGY
[88]   A question of our marketing or our preconceptions: Commentary on the paper 'A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession' [J].
Nathanael, Dimitris ;
Marmaras, Nicolas .
ERGONOMICS, 2012, 55 (12) :1612-1617
[89]  
Niiniluoto I, 2016, PHILOS ENG TECHNOL, V23, P93, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_6
[90]   Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline [J].
Norros, Leena .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (01) :61-71