A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

被引:85
作者
Levine-Clark, Michael [1 ]
Gil, Esther L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Denver, CO 80208 USA
关键词
Google Scholar; citation analysis; Web of Science; Scopus; collection development; business; economics; impact factor;
D O I
10.1080/08963560802176348
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This article presents the results of a comparative study of Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and Google Scholar (GS) for a set of 15 business and economics journals. Citations from the three sources were analyzed to determine whether one source is better than another, or whether a new database such as Scopus, or a free database such as GS could replace WoS. The authors concluded that scholars might want to use alternative tools collectively to get a more complete picture of the scholarly impact of an article.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 46
页数:15
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ETHICS SCI ENV POLIT, DOI 10.3354/esep005033 10.3354/esep005033
[2]   DO CITATIONS MATTER [J].
BAIRD, LM ;
OPPENHEIM, C .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1994, 20 (01) :2-15
[3]  
Ball R., 2006, Information Services & Use, V26, P293
[4]  
Bauer K., 2005, D LIB MAGAZINE, V11, DOI DOI 10.1045/SEPTEMBER2005-BAUER
[5]   Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: Uses, abuses, and implications [J].
Cameron, BD .
PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, 2005, 5 (01) :105-125
[6]  
Elsevier, 2006, SCIENCEDIRECT INFO
[7]   Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts [J].
Jacso, Peter .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2006, 30 (03) :297-309
[8]   The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries [J].
Nisonger, TE .
SERIALS LIBRARIAN, 2004, 47 (1-2) :57-75
[9]   Google Scholar: The new generation of citation indexes [J].
Noruzi, A .
LIBRI, 2005, 55 (04) :170-180
[10]  
Thomson, SCI CITATION INDEX J