IMPROVED DUODENAL-ULCER HEALING WITH PANTOPRAZOLE COMPARED WITH RANITIDINE - A MULTICENTER STUDY

被引：4

作者：

VANRENSBURG, CJ

VANEEDEN, PJ

MARKS, IN

ZAK, J

SIMJEE, AE

MOOLA, SAH

SPIES, SK

BUCHEL, E

GRUNDLING, HD

VANZYL, JH

MEKEL, R

机构：

[1] Gastroenterology Units, Departments of Medicine, Universities of Stellenbosch

[2] Gastroenterology Units, Departments of Medicine, Universities of Stellenbosch, Cape Town

[3] Gastroenterology Units, Departments of Medicine, Universities of Stellenbosch, Natal

[4] Gastroenterology Units, Departments of Medicine, Universities of Stellenbosch, Pretoria

[5] Gastroenterology Units, Departments of Medicine, Universities of Stellenbosch, Orange Free State

[6] Gastroenterology Units, Departments of Medicine, Universities of Stellenbosch, Nedpark medical center

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY | 1994年 / 6卷 / 08期

关键词：

PANTOPRAZOLE; RANITIDINE; DUODENAL ULCER; HEALING;

D O I：

10.1097/00042737-199408000-00018

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 40 mg (once daily in the morning) with ranitidine 300 mg (once daily at bedtime) in duodenal ulcer healing. Design: Prospective multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison. Patients: The study included 199 outpatients aged from 18 to 75 years, with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcer disease. Methods: Endoscopy and standard laboratory assessments, including serum gastrin levels, were carried out at the beginning of the study, after 2 and, where applicable, after 4 weeks. Results: Of the patients, 182 (98 on pantoprazole, 84 on ranitidine), median age 39 years, completed the study. Complete ulcer healing in protocol-correct patients after 2 weeks was significantly higher (P<0.001) in patients given pantoprazole (61%) compared with those given ranitidine (35%). After 4 weeks, the cumulative healing rates were 97 and 81%, respectively (P<0.001, Cochran-Mantel/Haenszel method). Ulcer healing occurred significantly faster with pantoprazole than with ranitidine (P<0.001, Uleman's U-test). Conclusions: Pantoprazole is significantly more effective than ranitidine for healing of duodenal ulcer both at 2 and 4 weeks. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to complete pain relief after 2 weeks of treatment. Both pantoprazole and ranitidine were well tolerated with no serious adverse events.

引用

页码：739 / 743

页数：5

共 16 条

[11]

Schultz H.U., Hartmann M., Steinijans V.W., Huber R., Luehmann B., Bliesath H., Et al., Lack of influence of pantoprazole on the disposition kinetics of theophylline in man, Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol, 9, pp. 369-375, (1991)

[12]

Gugler R., Hartmann M., Rudi J., Brod I., Hubert R., Steinijans V.W., Et al., Lack of Pharmacokinetic interaction of pantoprazole with diazepam in man [abstract], Gastroenterology, 102, (1992)

[13]

Schepp W., Classen M., Pantoprazole vs. Ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer -German multicenter study [abstract], Gastroenterology, 104, (1993)

[14]

Koelz H.R., Judmaier G., Double-blind comparison of pantoprazole and ranitidine in short-term treatment of acute duodenal ulcer [abstract], Gastroenterology, 104, (1993)

[15]

Solvell L., The clinical safety of omeprazole, Digestion, 47, pp. 59-63, (1990)

[16]

Muller P., Simon B., Khalil H., Luhmann R., Leucht U., Schneider A., Dose-range finding study with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole in acute duodenal ulcer patients, Z Gastroenterol, 30, pp. 771-775, (1992)

← 1 2 →