Parent-offspring conflict over clutch size

We present a model for sexually-reproducing diploids in which a female can produce a variable (generally large) clutch size, where the sibs then compete over some fixed resource, and where certain offspring use siblicide to reduce the primary clutch/brood size created by the mother. Where siblicide involves neither direct energy loss (e. g. fighting cost) nor gain (e. g. cannibalism) to an offspring, the optimal clutch size for an offspring can differ from the optimum for the mother, i.e. there can be parent-offspring conflict over clutch size. The magnitude of this evolutionary conflict (measured in terms of difference between clutch size optima) increases with multipaternity of the brood and with the steepness of the initial decline in offspring survivorship (through sib-competition as further offspring are added to the brood). However, the disparity in clutch size optima may not be great. Where the integer clutch size optima are the same, there will clearly be no conflict. Where this differs, resolution of the evolutionary conflict could involve much apparent behavioral conflict, commonly manifest as siblicidal aggression. The ESS (evolutionarily stable strategy) for such a game will depend upon the direct costs and benefits of siblicide, as well as on the indirect costs to sibs via relatedness. If the only costs of siblicide arise through relatedness, then offspring will 'win' in the sense that the eventual clutch size will match the offspring optimum. Whether or not the mother will produce this clutch size depends on the mechanism controlling siblicide. A siblicidal ESS will occur when offspring are programmed to kill a fixed number/proportion of a brood ('victim-based siblicide'), but not if programmed to reduce the sibship to the offspring optimum ('survivor-based siblicide'). With survivor-based siblicide, the mother can do no better than to lay the offsprings' optimal clutch size.