How do we know what is happening online? A mixed methods approach to analysing online activity

被引:4
作者
Charalampidi, Marina [1 ]
Hammond, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Ctr Educ Studies, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
Data analysis; E-learning; Mixed methods; Online discussion;
D O I
10.1108/ITSE-09-2016-0032
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the process of analysing online discussion and argue for the merits of mixed methods. Much research of online participation and e-learning has been either message-focused or person-focused. The former covers methodologies such as content and discourse analysis, the latter interviewing and surveys. The paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches in the context of a study of an online social educational network for gifted students. Design/methodology/approach - The design of this study included the use of content analysis, visualisation diagrams, interviews and questionnaire survey to understand the nature of online discussion and the experience of taking part. Findings - It was found that the message-focused analysis provided insight into participation and interaction patterns, whereas the surveys and interviews enabled access to members' preferences and attitudes. Originality/value - The contribution of the paper is to argue for a mixed approach in which different types of data can be compared and contrasted. While the use of mixed methods in social research in general has long been suggested, its adoption in the field of online learning is yet to be widely established, possibly because of its time-consuming and demanding nature. Despite these constraints, a mixed-methods approach is advocated, as it allows for a comprehensive picture of the use of the network and the experience of online participation.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 288
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning [J].
Agudo-Peregrina, Angel F. ;
Iglesias-Pradas, Santiago ;
Angel Conde-Gonzalez, Miguel ;
Hernandez-Garcia, Angel .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 31 :542-550
[2]  
Baker MJ, 2003, COMPUT-SUPP COLLAB L, V2, P11
[3]  
Blake C., 2014, P 9 INT C NETW LEARN, P25
[4]  
Charalampidi M, 2014, EDULEARN PROC, P6250
[5]   Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis [J].
de Laat, Maarten ;
Lally, Vic ;
Lipponen, Lasse ;
Simons, Robert-Jan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2007, 2 (01) :87-103
[6]   Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review [J].
De Wever, B ;
Schellens, T ;
Valcke, M ;
Van Keer, H .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2006, 46 (01) :6-28
[7]   Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse [J].
Dennen, Vanessa Paz .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 24 (02) :205-219
[8]  
Gunawardena CN, 1998, 14TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DISTANCE TEACHING AND LEARNING, PROCEEDINGS, P139
[9]  
Hammond M., 2005, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, V21, P283