Development and Validation of a Multiparameterized Artificial Neural Network for Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction and Stratification

被引:17
|
作者
Roffman, David A. [1 ]
Hart, Gregory R. [1 ]
Leapman, Michael S. [1 ]
Yu, James B. [1 ]
Guo, Fangliang L. [1 ]
Ali, Issa [1 ]
Deng, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
来源
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS | 2018年 / 2卷
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.17.00119
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To develop and validate a multiparameterized artificial neural network (ANN) on the basis of personal health information for prostate cancer risk prediction and stratification. Methods The 1997 to 2015 National Health Interview Survey adult survey data were used to train and validate a multiparameterized ANN, with parameters including age, body mass index, diabetes status, smoking status, emphysema, asthma, race, ethnicity, hypertension, heart disease, exercise habits, and history of stroke. We developed a training set of patients >= 45 years of age with a first primary prostate cancer diagnosed within 4 years of the survey. After training, the sensitivity and specificity were obtained as functions of the cutoff values of the continuous output of the ANN. We also evaluated the ANN with the 2016 data set for cancer risk stratification. Results We identified 1,672 patients with prostate cancer and 100,033 respondents without cancer in the 1997 to 2015 data sets. The training set had a sensitivity of 21.5% (95% CI, 19.2% to 23.9%), specificity of 91% (95% CI, 90.8% to 91.2%), area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.75), and positive predictive value of 28.5% (95% CI, 25.5% to 31.5%). The validation set had a sensitivity of 23.2% (95% CI, 19.5% to 26.9%), specificity of 89.4% (95% CI, 89% to 89.7%), area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.75), and positive predictive value of 26.5% (95% CI, 22.4% to 30.6%). For the 2016 data set, the ANN classified all 13,031 patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk subgroups and identified 5% of the cancer population as high risk. Conclusion A multiparameterized ANN that is based on personal health information could be used for prostate cancer risk prediction with high specificity and low sensitivity. The ANN can further stratify the population into three subgroups that may be helpful in refining prescreening estimates of cancer risk. (C) 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Clinical Validation of an In Situ Biopsy-Based Multimarker Assay for Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer
    Blume-Jensen, Peter
    Berman, David M.
    Rimm, David L.
    Shipitsin, Michail
    Putzi, Mathew
    Nifong, Thomas P.
    Small, Clayton
    Choudhury, Sibgat
    Capela, Teresa
    Coupal, Louis
    Ernst, Christina
    Hurley, Aeron
    Kaprelyants, Alex
    Chang, Hua
    Giladi, Eldar
    Nardone, Julie
    Dunyak, James
    Loda, Massimo
    Klein, Eric A.
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Latour, Mathieu
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Kantoff, Philip
    Saad, Fred
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (11) : 2591 - 2600
  • [22] Urine prostate cancer gene 3 assay for risk stratification and improved prediction for prostate cancer
    Wang, Rou
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    Wojno, Kirk J.
    Wei, John T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) : 704 - 705
  • [23] Stratification of gastric cancer risk using a deep neural network
    Nakahira, Hiroko
    Ishihara, Ryu
    Aoyama, Kazuharu
    Kono, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuda, Hiromu
    Shimamoto, Yusaku
    Nakagawa, Kentaro
    Ohmori, Masayasu
    Iwatsubo, Taro
    Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
    Matsuno, Kenshi
    Inoue, Shuntaro
    Matsuura, Noriko
    Shichijo, Satoki
    Maekawa, Akira
    Kanesaka, Takashi
    Yamamoto, Sachiko
    Takeuchi, Yoji
    Higashino, Koji
    Uedo, Noriya
    Matsunagat, Takashi
    Tada, Tomohiro
    JGH OPEN, 2020, 4 (03): : 466 - 471
  • [24] Development and validation of an improved risk stratification model for ovarian cancer
    Minh Tung Phung
    Lee, Alice W.
    McLean, Karen
    Khoja, Lilah
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    Bandera, Elisa V.
    Doherty, Jennifer Anne
    Fortner, Renee T.
    Goodman, Marc T.
    Modugno, Francesmary
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Webb, Penelope M.
    Wu, Anna H.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Hanley, Gillian E.
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    Pike, Malcolm C.
    Pearce, Celeste Leigh
    Trabert, Britton
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (05)
  • [25] AEC Project Performance Prediction and Validation Using the Artificial Neural Network
    Leung, Ivan
    Song, Min
    Kam, Calvin
    COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2017: SMART SAFETY, SUSTAINABILITY, AND RESILIENCE, 2017, : 360 - 367
  • [26] The development of nomograms for stratification of men at risk of prostate cancer prior to prostate biopsy
    Schmid, Marianne
    Hansen, Jens
    Rink, Micheal
    Fisch, Margit
    Chun, Felix
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 7 (06) : 843 - 850
  • [27] PROSTATE CANCER Improvements in risk stratification of prostate cancer
    Sandhu, Gurdarshan S.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2013, 10 (06) : 314 - 315
  • [28] Artificial neural network modelling enhances risk stratification for patients with suspected acute
    Cremer, P.
    Ismaeel, H.
    Sakr, G.
    Elhajj, I.
    Khalaf, S.
    Jaber, W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 79 - 79
  • [29] Novel artificial neural network for early detection of prostate cancer
    Djavan, B
    Remzi, M
    Zlotta, A
    Seitz, C
    Snow, P
    Marberger, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (04) : 921 - 929
  • [30] Statistical Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer and Development of a Risk Prediction Model Using an Artificial Neural Network Algorithm
    Hutt, Suzanna
    Mihaies, Denis
    Karteris, Emmanouil
    Michael, Agnieszka
    Payne, Annette M.
    Chatterjee, Jayanta
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (15)