Exploring Three Functions in Child Custody Evaluation for the Relocation Case: Prediction, Investigation, and Making Recommendations for a Long-Distance Parenting Plan

被引:9
作者
Austin, William G. [1 ]
Gould, Jonathan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Child Custody Consultants, Natl Consulting Grp, Austin, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHILD CUSTODY | 2006年 / 3卷 / 3-4期
关键词
Relocation; prediction; investigation; parenting plans;
D O I
10.1300/J190v03n03_04
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The psycho-legal dilemmas posed by child custody relocation cases are discussed in terms of the four decisional alternatives facing the court and evaluator. Different legal contexts for relocation are reviewed in terms of their implications for the custody evaluation. Complexities involved in the evaluator's function of making predictions for the court are presented. The need to conduct careful investigation on both risk and pragmatic factors is highlighted by case illustrations. The obstacles of crafting of long distance parenting plans that will be in the best interests of the child are presented as governed by the goal of harm mitigation. (C) 2006 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 108
页数:46
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Ainsworth M. D. S., 1978, PATTERNS ATTACHMENT
[2]   The effects of divorce and marital discord on adult children's psychological well-being [J].
Amato, PR ;
Sobolewski, JM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 66 (06) :900-921
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MARR MARR PERS, V9, P2
[4]  
Arizona Supreme Court, 2002, MOD PAR TIM PLANS PA
[5]  
*ASS FAM CONC COUR, 1995, MOD STAND CHILD CUST
[6]  
Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Task Force for Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, 2006, MOD STAND PRACT CHIL
[7]  
Austin W. G., 2005, ROLE CHILD FAMILY IN
[8]  
Austin W.G., 2004, J CHILD CUSTODY, V1, P23, DOI [10.1300/J190v01n02_02, DOI 10.1300/J190V01N02_02]
[9]  
Austin W. G., 2000, J DIVORCE REMARRIAGE, V33, P65, DOI DOI 10.1300/J087V33N01_04
[10]  
Austin W. G, 2002, FAMILY COURT REV, V40, P177, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.174-1617.2002.TB00828.X