QUANTIFYING THE RELATION BETWEEN SPEECH QUALITY AND SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY

被引:60
作者
PREMINGER, JE [1 ]
VANTASELL, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH | 1995年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
SPEECH QUALITY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; HEARING AIDS;
D O I
10.1044/jshr.3803.714
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present research was to examine the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility. Speech quality measurements were made using continuous discourse and a category rating procedure for the following dimensions: intelligibility, pleasantness, loudness, effort, and total impression. Measurements were made using a group of listeners with normal hearing for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility varied, and for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility was held constant near 100%. When ratings were made for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility was allowed to vary (a) intersubject reliability was high (i.e., different listeners interpreted the dimensions in a similar manner); and (b) the speech quality dimensions of intelligibility, effort, and loudness were indistinguishable. When ratings were made for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility was held constant (a) intersubject reliability was reduced, indicating that different listeners interpreted the dimensions in different ways; (b) most listeners rated each dimension differently, indicating that the dimensions were unique; and (c) across listeners, no single dimension was highly correlated with total impression. These results can be used in order to examine the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 725
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1989, S361939
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT
[3]   A COMPARISON OF SOUND QUALITY JUDGMENTS FOR MONAURAL AND BINAURAL HEARING-AID PROCESSED STIMULI [J].
BALFOUR, PB ;
HAWKINS, DB .
EAR AND HEARING, 1992, 13 (05) :331-339
[4]   EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL ACOUSTIC LABORATORIES NEW HEARING-AID SELECTION PROCEDURE [J].
BYRNE, D ;
COTTON, S .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 31 (02) :178-186
[5]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY RATING (SIR) TEST FOR HEARING-AID COMPARISONS [J].
COX, RM ;
MCDANIEL, DM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1989, 32 (02) :347-352
[6]  
FABRY DA, 1988, THESIS U MINNESOTA M
[7]   HEARING-AID SATURATION AND AIDED LOUDNESS DISCOMFORT [J].
FORTUNE, TW ;
PREVES, DA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 35 (01) :175-185
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT FREQUENCY RESPONSES ON SOUND QUALITY JUDGMENTS AND SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY [J].
GABRIELSSON, A ;
SCHENKMAN, BN ;
HAGERMAN, B .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 31 (02) :166-177
[9]  
GABRIELSSON A, 1979, Scandinavian Audiology, V8, P159, DOI 10.3109/01050397909076317
[10]   PERCEIVED SOUND QUALITY OF SOUND-REPRODUCING SYSTEMS [J].
GABRIELSSON, A ;
SJOGREN, H .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1979, 65 (04) :1019-1033