Robotic Surgery in Gynecology

被引:54
作者
de Joliniere, Jean Bouquet [1 ]
Librino, Armando [1 ]
Dubuisson, Jean-Bernard [1 ]
Khomsi, Fathi [1 ]
Ben Ali, Nordine [1 ]
Fadhlaoui, Anis [1 ]
Ayoubi, J. M. [2 ]
Feki, Anis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Oncol Surg, Fribourg, Switzerland
[2] Foch Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Oncol Surg, Suresnes, France
关键词
robotic; laparoscopic surgery; gynecology; minimal invasive surgery; ambulatory care;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2016.00026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can be considered as the greatest surgical innovation over the past 30 years. It revolutionized surgical practice with well-proven advantages over traditional open surgery: reduced surgical trauma and incision-related complications, such as surgical-site infections, postoperative pain and hernia, reduced hospital stay, and improved cosmetic outcome. Nonetheless, proficiency in MIS can be technically challenging as conventional laparoscopy is associated with several limitations as the two-dimensional (2D) monitor reduction in-depth perception, camera instability, limited range of motion, and steep learning curves. The surgeon has a low force feedback, which allows simple gestures, respect for tissues, and more effective treatment of complications. Since the 1980s, several computer sciences and robotics projects have been set up to overcome the difficulties encountered with conventional laparoscopy, to augment the surgeon's skills, achieve accuracy and high precision during complex surgery, and facilitate widespread of MIS. Surgical instruments are guided by haptic interfaces that replicate and filter hand movements. Robotically assisted technology offers advantages that include improved three-dimensional stereoscopic vision, wristed instruments that improve dexterity, and tremor canceling software that improves surgical precision.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[2]  
Boggess JF, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V199, pe1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AJ0G.2008.06.058
[3]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265
[4]  
Carbonnel M, 2013, REPROD SYST SEX DISO, V2, P1
[5]   Robotic surgery [J].
Diana, M. ;
Marescaux, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (02) :E15-E28
[6]   A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy [J].
Estape, Ricardo ;
Lambrou, Nicholas ;
Diaz, Robert ;
Estape, Eric ;
Dunkin, Natalie ;
Rivera, Angel .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (03) :357-361
[7]   Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach [J].
Feuer, Gerald A. ;
Lakhi, Nisha ;
Barker, James ;
Salmieri, Stephen ;
Burrell, Mathew .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) :520-524
[8]   A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study [J].
Freeman, R. M. ;
Pantazis, K. ;
Thomson, A. ;
Frappell, J. ;
Bombieri, L. ;
Moran, P. ;
Slack, M. ;
Scott, P. ;
Waterfield, M. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (03) :377-384
[9]   Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Compared With Traditional Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Approaches A Systematic Review [J].
Gaia, Giorgia ;
Holloway, Robert W. ;
Santoro, Luigi ;
Ahmad, Sarfraz ;
Di Silverio, Elena ;
Spinillo, Arsenio .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (06) :1422-1431
[10]   What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? [J].
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Abaid, Lisa N. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01) :41-45