UTILITY OF AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACOUSTIC NEUROMAS

被引:0
作者
CHANDRASEKHAR, SS
BRACKMANN, DE
DEVGAN, KK
机构
[1] HOUSE EAR RES INST,2100 W 3RD ST,LOS ANGELES,CA 90057
[2] HOUSE EAR CLIN INC,LOS ANGELES,CA
[3] UNIV SO CALIF,SCH MED,LOS ANGELES,CA 90033
[4] UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,NEWARK,NJ 07103
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) audiometry is said to be 90% sensitive in the diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Since gadolinium-DTPA was introduced, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is capable of detecting acoustic neuromas as small as 3 mm. Early diagnosis is important, because hearing can frequently be preserved with resection of tumors smaller than 2 cm. At the same time, cost-containment has become a pressing issue in medicine. Auditory brainstem response, although considerably less expensive than MRI, may not be as sensitive as previously thought, particularly for small tumors. Of 753 acoustic neuromas treated at the House Ear Clinic from January 1988 through March 1993, 197 had ABR data available. The 98 males and 99 females ranged in age from 13 to 78 years with a mean of 48 years. The overall sensitivity of ABR was 92.3% using an interaural latency difference for wave V of more than 0.2 ms, and was 81.6% using waveform morphology. There was a statistically significant difference in sensitivity with respect to tumor size. Auditory brainstem response interaural latency difference sensitivity ranged from 100% in tumors larger than 3.0 cm to 83.1% in tumors 1.0 cm or smaller. Waveform morphology was abnormal in 100% of tumors larger than 2.0 cm but in only 76.5% of tumors 1.0 cm or smaller.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ANDERSON H, 1970, Acta Oto-Laryngologica Supplement, V263, P232
[2]   ACOUSTIC NEUROMA PRESENTING AS SUDDEN HEARING-LOSS WITH RECOVERY [J].
BERG, HM ;
COHEN, NL ;
HAMMERSCHLAG, PE ;
WALTZMAN, SB .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1986, 94 (01) :15-22
[3]  
BUSABA NY, 1994, AM J OTOL, V15, P233
[4]   HEARING CONSERVATION IN ACOUSTIC TUMOR SURGERY - PROS AND CONS [J].
CLEMIS, JD .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1984, 92 (02) :156-161
[5]   HEARING PRESERVATION - POSTERIOR-FOSSA APPROACH [J].
COHEN, NL ;
RANSOHOFF, J .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1984, 92 (02) :176-183
[6]  
COHEN NL, 1986, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V95, P21, DOI 10.1177/000348948609500105
[7]  
GLASSCOCK ME, 1987, LARYNGOSCOPE, V97, P785
[8]  
GLASSCOCK ME, 1987, LARYNGOSCOPE, V97, P1164
[9]   INTRACANALICULAR ACOUSTIC NEUROMA - EARLY SURGERY FOR PRESERVATION OF HEARING [J].
HAINES, SJ ;
LEVINE, SC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1993, 79 (04) :515-520
[10]   RETROSIGMOID REMOVAL OF ACOUSTIC NEUROMA - EXPERIENCE 1978-1988 [J].
HARNER, SG ;
BEATTY, CW ;
EBERSOLD, MJ .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1990, 103 (01) :40-45