Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue

被引：4

作者：

Botta, Alberto ^{[1
]}

Porcile, Gabriel ^{[2
,3
]}

Ribeiro, Rafael S. M. ^{[4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Greenwich, London, England

[2] Comis Econ Amer Latina & Carib, Santiago, Chile

[3] Univ Fed Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

[4] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

[5] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England

来源：

PSL QUARTERLY REVIEW | 2018年 / 71卷 / 285期

关键词：

economic development; technical change; income distribution; Latin America;

D O I：

10.13133/2037-3643_71.285_1

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

The original "manifesto" that gave rise to the Structuralist development theory was written for the Economic Commission of Latin America (ECLA, subsequently ECLAC, after incorporating the Caribbean States in 1984) by Raul Prebisch (1949). This work had a strong impact on both the theoretical and policy debates and served as a rationale for the efforts at structural change and industrialization that many developing countries adopted in the following decades. By and large, the Latin American Structuralist tradition focuses on how the external constraint disproportionately affects output growth and domestic policies in less developed economies. The existence of bottlenecks in the productive system and labor market dualism characterizing peripheral economies opens space for state intervention and industrial policies as a way to promote structural transformation and economic development.

引用

页码：97 / 101

页数：5

共 20 条

[1] Akyuz Y., Liberalization Financial Instability and Economic Development, (2014)
[2] Ciarli T., Lorenz A., Valente M., Savona M., Structural changes and growth regimes, Document de Travail, No. 2017-19, (2017)
[3] Cimoli M., Katz J., Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: A Latin American perspective, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 2, pp. 387-411, (2003)
[4] Dosi G., Pavitt K., Soete G., The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, (1990)
[5] Dosi G., Fagiolo G., Roventini A., Schumpeter meeting keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34, 9, pp. 1748-1767, (2010)
[6] Dosi G., Napoletano M., Roventini A., Treibich T., Micro and macro policies in the keynes+schumpeter evolutionary models, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27, 1, pp. 63-90, (2017)
[7] Dutt A.K., Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8, 1, pp. 25-40, (1984)
[8] Dutt A.K., Ros J., Aggregate demand shocks and economic growth, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18, 1, pp. 75-99, (2007)
[9] The Inefficiency of Inequality, (2018)
[10] Frenkel R., Rapetti M., A developing country view of the current global crisis: What should not be forgotten and what should be done, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 4, pp. 685-702, (2009)

← 1 2 →