Risk factors and distribution of MDROs among patients with healthcare associated burn wound infection

被引:17
作者
ALfadli, Mariam [1 ]
EL-sehsah, Eman M. [2 ,3 ]
Ramadan, Moustapha Ahmed-Maher [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sabbah Hlth Reg, Infect Control Directorate, Minist Hlth, POB 12414, Alshamiya, Kuwait
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Microbiol & Immunol Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Sabbah Hlth Reg, Minist Hlth, Infect Control Directorate, Infect Control, POB 12414, Alshamiya, Kuwait
[4] Alexandria Univ, Fac Med, Community Med Dept, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Epidemiology; antimicrobial resistance; health care associated infection; burn; infection control; surveillance;
D O I
10.18683/germs.2018.1147
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Introduction Patients with burn wounds are more susceptible to develop healthcare associated (HA) infection. Bacterial isolates from HA burn wound infection vary from one place to the other and also differ in terms of antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of HA burn wound infection, risk factors and to determine the microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated pathogens. Methods This was a one-year retrospective descriptive study conducted between January 2017 and December 2017, in Al-Babtain Burn and Plastic Surgery center, Kuwait. The identification of bacterial isolates was conducted by conventional biochemical methods according to standard microbiological techniques and commercially available kits using analytical profile index procedure. Results Total body surface area >35% affected and length of stay more than 14 days were statistically significant risk factors for HA burn infection (RR of 10.057 and 5.912, respectively). Analysis of microbiological profile of these positive cultures indicated that the most common isolated organism was Acinetobacter baumannil followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Multidrug resistant organisms composed 65.85% of the positive isolates. Vancomycin, tigecycline, teicoplanin and linezolid showed 100% effectiveness for all Gram positive isolates. For Gram negative organisms, imipenem and meropenem showed 38.71% and 41.93% efficacy, respectively. Conclusion Identification of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns helps to tailor the required antibiotic policy to minimize the acquired infections among these vulnerable patients.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT SURG J
[2]   Three-year Review of Bacteriological Profile and Antibiogram of Burn Wound Isolates in Van, Turkey [J].
Bayram, Yasemin ;
Parlak, Mehmet ;
Aypak, Cenk ;
Bayram, Irfan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 10 (01) :19-23
[3]  
Bhat V. G., 2010, Southern African Journal of Epidemiology & Infection, V25, P16
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC NHSN SURV DEF SP
[5]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2015, PERFORMANCE STANDARD, V27th
[6]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2015, MO2A12 CLSI
[7]  
Coetzee E, 2013, S AFR J SURG, V51, P50, DOI [10.7196/sajs.1134, 10.7196/SAJS.1134]
[8]   The relationship between antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: Mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care costs [J].
Cosgrove, SE .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 :S82-S89
[9]  
El-Maghawry HAMM, 2016, INT J CURR MICROBIOL, V5, P566
[10]  
Emami SA, 2015, MERIT RES J MED MED, V3, P135