STRATEGIC-PLANNING IN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS - AHP APPLICATION TO AN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DECISION

被引：58

作者：

OELTJENBRUNS, H

KOLARIK, EJ

SCHNADTKIRSCHNER, R

机构：

[1] TEXAS TECH UNIV,DEPT IND ENGN,LUBBOCK,TX 79409

[2] MERCEDES BENZ AG,VERFAHRENSENTWICKLUNG PROZESSTECH,D-70322 STUTTGART,GERMANY

[3] DEUTSCH AEROSP AIRBUS GMBH,D-26316 VAREL,GERMANY

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS | 1995年 / 38卷 / 2-3期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/0925-5273(94)00092-O

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) has been investigated with respect to its compatibility with strategic planning in manufacturing. Specifically, it was examined in its ability to support decisions in incrementing an organization towards higher levels of automation/technology in their manufacturing processes. The replacement of several milling machines at Deutsche Aerospace Airbus, Germany, required the development of a strategic plan to address both automation in manufacturing systems and machinery replacement. The objective of this research was to develop/explore different planning alternatives ranging from extending the life of existing machinery to total replacement with a new manufacturing system and to evaluate these alternatives through economical and technological criteria. Quantitative (financial and technological) and qualitative (intangible) benefits of investments in new manufacturing systems were considered using the AHP with the aid of AutoMan, a microcomputer program for multiple criteria decision making.

引用

页码：189 / 197

页数：9

共 19 条

[1]

Suresh, Meredith, Justifying multimachine systems: An integrated strategic approach, J. Manuf. Systems, 4, pp. 117-130, (1985)

[2]

Proctor, Canada, Past and present methods of manufacturing investment evaluation A review of the empirical and theoretical literature, The Engineering Economist, 38, pp. 45-58, (1992)

[3]

Suresh, An extended multi-objective replacement model for flexible automation investments, Int. J. Prod. Res., 29, pp. 1823-1844, (1991)

[4]

Kaplan, Must CIM be justified by faith alone?, Harv. Bus. Rev., 64, pp. 87-94, (1986)

[5]

Azzone, Bertele, Measuring the economic effectiveness of flexible automation: A new approach, Int. J. Prod. Res., 27, pp. 735-746, (1989)

[6]

Luxhoj, Replacement analysis for components of large scale production systems, Int. J. Prod. Econom., 27, pp. 97-110, (1992)

[7]

Badiru, Strategic planning for automated manufacturing: Some factors and dimensions, Justification Methods for CIM Planning, Design, Justification and Costing, pp. 17-39, (1990)

[8]

Meredith, Suresh, Justification techniques for advanced manufacturing technologies, Int. J. Prod. Res., 24, pp. 1043-1057, (1986)

[9]

Chen, Everett, The impact of flexible manufacturing systems on productivity and quality, IEEE Trans. Eng. Mgmt., 38, pp. 33-45, (1991)

[10]

Kakati, Dhar, Investment justification in flexible manufacturing systems, Eng. Costs Prod. Econom., 21, pp. 203-209, (1991)

← 1 2 →