A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs)

被引：142

作者：

Scherer, Marcia ^{[1
]}

Jutai, Jeffrey ^{[2
]}

Fuhrer, Marcus ^{[3
]}

Demers, Louise ^{[4
]}

Deruyter, Frank ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Inst Matching Person & Technol, 486 Lake Rd, Webster, NY 14580 USA

[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, London, ON, Canada

[3] Natl Inst Hlth, Natl Inst Child Hlth & Human Dev, Bethesda, MD USA

[4] Univ Montreal, Ecole Readapt, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Speech Pathol & Audiol, Durham, NC USA

来源：

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY | 2007年 / 2卷 / 01期

关键词：

Assistive device; assistive technology; assessment; model; rehabilitation; disability; outcome; theory; International Classification of Functioning; Disability and Health;

D O I：

10.1080/17483100600845414

中图分类号：

R49 [康复医学];

学科分类号：

100215 ;

摘要：

Purpose. The previously published 'Framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device (ATD) outcomes' assumes antecedent factors that inform it and influence its component variables. This paper proposes a model of factors influencing consumer predispositions and provider practices related to procuring a particular ATD, which is the starting point in the framework. Method. The relevant literature on a variety of factors that influence specific ATD selection is summarized. Results. The decision that a particular ATD is an appropriate and desirable support for an individual is the result of a process which is affected by a broader societal climate that determines, in part, unique personal climates which then foster unique provider and consumer perspectives predisposing each to the selection of a particular ATD. Conclusions. The proposed 'Framework for modelling the selection of ATDs' can contribute to clinical practice and outcomes research by highlighting factors important to consider prior to ATD selection.

引用

页码：1 / 8

页数：8

共 43 条

[1]

ARTHANAT S, 2004, 10 N AM COLL CTR NAC

[2] Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users:: a follow-up study [J].

Brandt, Å ;

Iwarsson, S ;

Ståhl, A .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (07) :343-353

[3] PSYCHOSOCIAL PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN ACUTE AND SUBCHRONIC LOW-BACK TROUBLE [J].

BURTON, AK ;

TILLOTSON, KM ;

MAIN, CJ ;

HOLLIS, S .

SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) :722-728

[4] Delivering an AT service: a client-focused, social and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland [J].

Craddock, G ;

McCormack, L .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 24 (1-3) :160-170

[5]

Craddock GM, 2003, THESIS

[6]

Cushman L A, 1996, Assist Technol, V8, P103

[7] Consumer-identified barriers and strategies for optimizing technology use in the workplace [J].

De Jonge, Desleigh M. ;

Rodger, Sylvia A. .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (1-2) :79-88

[8] Non-use of assistivetechnology in The Netherlands: A non-issue? [J].

Dijcks, B. P. J. ;

De Witte, L. P. ;

Gelderblom, G. J. ;

Wessels, R. D. ;

Soede, M. .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (1-2) :97-102

[9]

Dunbar-Jacob J, 2000, Annu Rev Nurs Res, V18, P48

[10] A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes [J].

Fuhrer, MJ ;

Jutai, JW ;

Scherer, MJ ;

Deruyter, F .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 25 (22) :1243-1251

← 1 2 3 4 5 →